User talk:JamesJohnson2

There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Philip Cross (talk) 07:52, 11 September 2016 (UTC)

Milosevic
Please stop your obsession with adding your own interpretation of what the ICTY judgment means, and messing up basic copyediting as you do so. If you revert again, I will go a relevant noticeboard about this. In all likelihood, third-party editors will say the material should not be there at all, as it is from a primary source and about another case altogether. As I said before, count yourself lucky it's there as it is. There's also, as noted, a risk your account will end up blocked. If you want to shout about Milosevic's innocence, and inform the world of the "real facts", please start a blog or contribute to a forum.  N-HH   talk / edits  12:04, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
 * OK, as promised. Please see here.  N-HH   talk / edits  12:15, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
 * That's OK anyone with little intellect will agree with me.

February 2017
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for edit warring, as you did at Trial of Slobodan Milošević. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Bbb23 (talk) 16:29, 4 February 2017 (UTC)