User talk:JamesMLane/ArbCom supplement

Comment from VeryVerily moved from main page

 * It is not accurate that I only later "got around to reading" what I'd been reverting. I was aware Rex was involved in formatting changes, which is why I found Neutrality's edit summary that "rv - Rex, you don’t have the authority to arbitrarily deem POV and remove material"  to be entirely disingenuous.  (This strongly suggested to me that it was Neutrality who was not paying attention.)  There were three changes made - the header section alteration, the changing of the title of the section, and the changing of the image size.  No material was deemed POV and removed.  I had no particular opinion on the changes in question, but the reason given for undoing another user's edits was invalid (and a characteristic pattern with Neutrality is just reverting without bothering to look at the text), so I assumed Rex made them in good faith and restored them.  The section formatting is a pretty minor issue; I don't see it as an extremist "anti-Kerry" edit to shift around the indentation of headings.  Furthermore, formatting errors are trivial to adjust and not justification for going on a revert rampage. V V  08:20, 14 Aug 2004 (UTC)