User talk:JamesMLawrence

Antigua - Chief Towns
Hi James. Thanks for the reply on my talk page regarding the entry for Antigua. I have replied on that articles discussion page. Oh and if you add four tildes after your entry on talk pages then it will sign and date the entry on your behalf. In short though I agree that 'chief' towns is non-sensical and could do with being re-worked Adam777 17:43, 5 June 2006 (UTC)

December 2007
Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove speedy deletion tags from pages that you have created yourself. If you do not believe the page should be deleted, then please place  on the page (please do not remove any existing speedy deletion tag) and make your case on the page's. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. MECU ≈ talk 18:05, 28 December 2007 (UTC)

If you have a close connection to some of the people, places or things you have written about, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:
 * 1) editing articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
 * 2) participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors;
 * 3) linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam);
 * and you must always:
 * 1) avoid breaching relevant policies and guidelines, especially neutral point of view, verifiability, and autobiography.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have conflict of interest, please see Business' FAQ. For more details about what constitutes a conflict of interest, please see Conflict of Interest.

May 2008
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appeared to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. -- Collectonian  (talk · contribs) 01:04, 27 May 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for File:Coral Magazine Cover.gif
Thanks for uploading File:Coral Magazine Cover.gif. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 15:04, 29 March 2009 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:CORAL-Magazine Cover 400px.gif
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:CORAL-Magazine Cover 400px.gif, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Acather96 (talk) 18:46, 2 November 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Coral Magazine


The article Coral Magazine has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Questionably notable and improvable article for a publication, as my searches found no better sourcing at all than one third-party publication at Books with "Coral, The Reef & Marine Aquarium Magazine" and the founder Daniel Knop also seems questionably notable so I have tagged him for PROD as well, eliminating the chances of moving this to his article instead.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on |the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. SwisterTwister  talk  07:41, 7 January 2016 (UTC)