User talk:JamesMoose

Paulo César Fonseca do Nascimento
Hi there JAMES, AL from Portugal "speaking",

this edit in this footballer's article (please see here https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Paulo_C%C3%A9sar_Fonseca_do_Nascimento&diff=595670993&oldid=595248655) was everything but good faith like your summary read, this "person" proceeded to insult the subject of the article, in Portuguese, almost justifying the racist abuse he suffered.

Attentively, happy editing --AL (talk) 00:49, 17 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Reading it better: i stand corrected, he did not insult Mr.Nascimento, he insulted the Peruvian people! "Charming", either way you look at it. --AL (talk) 00:51, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
 * No problem, I can't read Portuguese so I marked it as good faith just to be safe. --JamesMoose (talk) 01:15, 17 February 2014 (UTC)

Review
Hi,

I just received a notification on Wikipedia informing me that I was reviewed by you. I'm unfamiliar with Wikipedia's user review process. Do you know what this means?

Thanks, Erickspedian (talk) 01:16, 18 February 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:59, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Gorilla glue.png
 Thanks for uploading File:Gorilla glue.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:32, 20 February 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Pokémon: Generations for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Pokémon: Generations is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pokémon: Generations until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ad516 00:22, 17 October 2017 (UTC)