User talk:JamesMoose/Archive 1

Welcome
Hello, BigPimpinBrah, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type   and your question on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer. Here are a few good links for newcomers: We hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on talk and vote pages using four tildes, like this: &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126;. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom  22:31, 29 January 2013 (UTC)
 * The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Editing tutorial
 * Picture tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Naming conventions
 * Simplified Manual of Style

Neutral point of view
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at Barack Obama citizenship conspiracy theories, you may be blocked from editing. -- Orange Mike &#x7C;  Talk  18:48, 30 January 2013 (UTC)

Please stop attacking other editors, as you did on Talk:Barack Obama citizenship conspiracy theories‎. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. -- Orange Mike &#x7C;  Talk  14:30, 21 February 2013 (UTC)

Ayu
You have not edited Ayu and I have not reverted you. You will need to be more specific. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom  20:52, 30 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Your edit consists of your personal commentary and analysis and not sourced content from a reliable, published source. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom  20:56, 30 January 2013 (UTC)
 * I have remove the other unsourced interpretation as well. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom  21:05, 30 January 2013 (UTC)

User:166.82.144.59/Clifford Buck
This is in regards to your speedy deletion nomination for the page User:166.82.144.59/Clifford Buck. You marked the page for speedy deletion. However, that tag falls under the guidelines of speedy deletion criterion A7, which only applies to pages in the "Article space". This page is clearly in the "User space", and does not apply for this criterion.

However, I think that this page qualifies for speedy deletion criterion U2, since this is a subpage connected to an IP address' userpage. I'm going to tag this page with the tag to see if it applies. Steel1943 (talk) 04:02, 18 February 2013 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!
Thanks, brah :) BigPimpinBrah (talk) 06:01, 19 February 2013 (UTC)

Checking references
Hi Brah, I thought I'd point out that not working ≠ fake. I was able to find good references for two of those awards, and a blog post that, while not suitable as a reference, does lend credence to the third. Lady of  Shalott  22:41, 23 February 2013 (UTC)

Appalachian English boxes
Hi, I reverted your deletion of the Babel boxes for Appalachian English. The boxes are meant to represent a specific dialect spoken in the Appalachians, but not the speech of everyone who lives in the Appalachian region of the United States. The text is spelled in the manner used by some professional linguists, who take the dialect seriously. You can find samples here at the website of the LOWLANDS-L mailing list (devoted to several dialects of English and other Germanic languages).

I hope this addresses your concerns that "this shit is insulting." If not, let's talk about it. — ℜob C. alias &Agrave;LAROB  17:56, 8 March 2013 (UTC)


 * How come the Appalachian boxes have to be different but the Scottish ones are written normally? It's not like midwestern English is spoken the same way it's written either, the banned user who made those boxes probably did it to make fun of people. BigPimpinBrah (talk) 18:35, 8 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Also some words are spelled wrong even though they're pronounced the same way by Midwesterners. e.g. Tawk, mount'ns, Inglish, are all pronounced that way by Midwesterners too. BigPimpinBrah (talk) 23:28, 8 March 2013 (UTC)

The spelling used in the Appalachian boxes is not intended to be insulting. The user who made those boxes (if you're referring to the Appalachian ones) has not been banned. I know because I'm that user. My motive was and is to promote interest in the dialect and challenge stereotypes of dialect speakers as ignorant, inbred hillbillies.

The userboxes try to represent Appalachian English instead of standard American English because that is how the "Babel boxes" normally work. Where the words are "spelled wrong," the change is meant to suggest how the sound of the spoken language differs from that of standard English. It would be more accurate of course to use the International Phonetic Alphabet, but most Wikipedia users can’t read those symbols. I have trouble with them too. So I modeled the spelling on the text at the Lowlands-L website I linked to above. That site was created by linguists who take the dialect seriously and regard Appalachian culture as, in their words, "a treasure trove." That is my opinion as well.

Using "tawk" in connection with Appalachian English does not imply that only Appalachian English speakers pronounce the word that way. And while dialect has often been represented in print in a demeaning way, or with a demeaning intent, that does not mean that all attempts to represent dialect in print are demeaning.

I'm sure the boxes can be improved, and other editors have stepped in to make improvements from time to time. You mention the spelling of "Inglish," and I wouldn't have a problem with changing it to standard "English" if it seems like an unnecesary misspelling. I used "Inglish" because that's how the Lowlands-L contributor spelled the word. I think the intent was to show that the word is pronounced with the short i of "sing," not the short e of "men" — i.e., not the way most English pronounce the word "English." I think every American dialect of English pronounces the word "English" this way (with "ing"), so maybe the initial I is unnecessary.

I guess it's really a question of whether British English or American English is considered the "standard." If it's British, "Inglish" makes sense; if American, not so much. — ℜob C. alias &Agrave;LAROB  18:38, 9 March 2013 (UTC)

Your request for rollback
Hi BigPimpinBrah. After reviewing your request for rollback, I have enabled rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback: If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see New admin school/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! Yunshui 雲 &zwj; 水  13:58, 2 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
 * Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
 * Rollback should never be used to edit war.
 * If abused, rollback rights can be revoked.
 * Use common sense.

Watch for copyvios!
Hi BigPimpinBrah. You recently moved the page Asante Africa Foundation from AFC after reviewing - however, it only took me a few moments to locate numerous copyright violations within the article, and I had to remove most of the text as a result. Please do be wary of admitting new articles to mainspace without checking for copyright issues first - running the page through Earwig's Copyvio Detector before taking it "live" is a very good idea - at the very least, you should Google a few chunks to see what comes up. This holds doubly true for this particular article, since it was actually deleted in December as a a copyvio of the exact same website. Yunshui 雲 &zwj; 水  12:09, 5 April 2013 (UTC)
 * I have rewritten the copyrighted text --BigPimpinBrah (talk) 17:52, 5 April 2013 (UTC)

Chrominance Decoder Rejection
Hi, I did a kick-ass job with my article, I want to know what makes you an expert in the artist. I've researched this artist for more than 5 years and based it on the websites cited on the article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by PaulinaAngel (talk • contribs) 06:35, 6 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Your submission does not cite coverage from any reliable sources, and therefore fails to demonstrate notability. Please read the links I have provided to understand why I declined your submission. --BigPimpinBrah (talk) 16:29, 6 April 2013 (UTC)

Spurious rejection notice not appreciated
I recently did a request for creation on a article on Liddel Strength; this article was accepted on 26 March 2013 by reviewer The Anonymouse. You have subsequently (10 April 2013) posted on my talk page a message notifying me that the article has been rejected by you. On investigation, your grounds for rejection are that the article is already there and accepted; subsequent to your rejection of my RfC the earlier acceptance of it by another reviewer remains in force, and your 'rejection' has no practical effect
 * one review is quite enough thank you
 * if you do find yourself duplicating the review work of somebody else, then there must be a better way of resolving this than by sending a rejection message postdating an acceptance message for the same article, especially when it is the acceptance notice that remains effective.

I suggest you ask around as to what the correct sign-off procedure is in these circumstances, but surely it would be preferable to back out quietly, rather than sending misleading messages to the article author; if rejection carries a risk of hacking off authors, the same applies with greater force to spurious rejection. Regards Rjccumbria (talk) 14:55, 13 April 2013 (UTC)

Deletion Response
This is in response to your deletion of Jaylen Bledsoe in regards to a speedy deletion. The individual in which this page was written on behalf of, is in fact a known Corporate Executive in St. Louis Missouri. As listed by Fox Station, http://fox2now.com/2012/03/19/13-year-old-starts-tech-business/. It would be great if you could undo the deletion this page. Scottgramble (talk) 20:46, 14 April 2013 (UTC)


 * I don't have the power to delete or restore pages, I tagged it for speedy deletion because it did not cite any reliable sources. You can recreate the page, but keep in mind that being the subject of a single news piece isn't necessarily enough to satisfy Wikipedia's inclusion policy per WP:BIO --BigPimpinBrah (talk) 20:54, 14 April 2013 (UTC)

Congratulations from STiki!

 * Thanks brah --BigPimpinBrah (talk) 13:54, 16 April 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Jaylen Bledsoe


A tag has been placed on Jaylen Bledsoe, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Might apply under a R2, but a apaprent COI user moving their creation to Article space after submitting for AfC is not a good idea

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Hasteur (talk) 19:39, 17 April 2013 (UTC)

warning to User talk:177.9.220.189
He BigPimpinBrah, just a short note that I removed your user warning to 177.xxx, as I think the edit was (although devoid of edit summary; and was a removal) constructive, and had already mentioned so just above the section you make (but I don't know if stiki allows you to see that)… L.tak (talk) 08:36, 20 April 2013 (UTC)

Reviewer
Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges. A full list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on will be at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:
 * Reviewing, the guideline on reviewing
 * Pending changes, the summary of the use of pending changes
 * Protection policy, the policy determining which pages can be given pending changes protection by administrators.

INeverCry  23:15, 20 April 2013 (UTC)

Congratulations from STiki!
Thanks --BigPimpinBrah (talk) 16:12, 21 April 2013 (UTC)

History of Lebanon
attention: history of lebanon, I never edited 213.175.191.233 (talk) 18:27, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Your contributions show it was edited by your IP address yesterday. It may have been another person on the same network, however. --BigPimpinBrah (talk) 18:31, 22 April 2013 (UTC)

Edits to Quorn by IP 82.47.140.227
Hello BigPimpinBrah, just to let you know I undid an edit you marked as vandalism with STiki as it doesn't appear vandalism. I've left the warning on the users talk page if you're in agreement with me then it's probably best if you remove it since you left it. I've seen your name come up quite a bit recently, over 5000 STiki checks in 7 days - no mean feat. Keep up the good work! Thanks Fraggle81 (talk) 00:21, 23 April 2013 (UTC)
 * done --BigPimpinBrah (talk) 00:29, 23 April 2013 (UTC)


 * 1) 1. Grow up, what kind of username is bigpimpimbrah
 * 2) 2. Don't take me for a fool.
 * 3) 3. Are you an aquarist? Have you ever owned a checker barb? Have you talked to experts on the matter? Do you know anything about what your undoing?
 * 4) 4. Do you know the meaning of constructive?
 * 5) 5. You don't
 * 6) 6. Spend more time doing real work instead of bothering other people's research.
 * 7) 7. You can either reverse the entry, cause I won't bother. Or you can buy an aquarium and find out yourself what kind of "peaceful" fish a checker barb really is. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.76.241.78 (talk) 12:56, 28 April 2013 (UTC)

Usernames
Although you've been a good editor overall, I'd like to ask you to change your username. Your current username alludes to someone who lives off the avails of procuring and prostitution; pimps are invariably abusive -- physically, psychologically, or both.

I haven't blocked you, and I don't expect that I will. However, it would be most considerate of you to file a request at Changing username for a name that's less offensive. DS (talk) 00:25, 30 April 2013 (UTC)

Talkback
Ushau97 (talk) 05:10, 1 May 2013 (UTC)

Bigpimpinbrah1
I am writing to notify you that there is an editor using the name Bigpimpinbrah1. I reported the user to the appropriate notice board. Andrew327 18:30, 1 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Definitely looks suspicious, seems to be a guy mad that I reverted him, thanks for letting me know --BigPimpinBrah (talk) 18:43, 1 May 2013 (UTC)

cypenamine correction
Hello I keep trying to correct a statement on this page which says "the trans isomer is more active than the racemate" this should be deleted as it makes no sense at all (I KNOW WHAT I`AM TALKING ABOUT)!!. But it keeps getting changed back, WHY??? I am not a registered user and do not know the ins and outs of Wikipedia etiquette. I am just trying to be helpful here!! If this statement is actually in the literature reference I would be very surprised and it would still not make it correct. I have thus started a new talk section about it.

122.109.127.168 (talk) 05:21, 5 May 2013 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.109.127.168 (talk) 05:01, 5 May 2013 (UTC)

Ponaganset High School Page
Why do you keep deleting the reputable revisions that I make to the Ponaganset High School page. Everything that I publish is real, since I used to attend the school, and I know many people that attend it now. It makes no sense to me that you have deleted the changes twice now LORDDT01 (talk) 20:17, 16 May 2013 (UTC)


 * Most of the information is unsourced, and it is blatantly promotional and not written from a neutral point of view. Also all information must be verifiable. --BigPimpinBrah (talk) 23:05, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
 * I've done some editing to the article, I hope you will be ok with the current revision. --BigPimpinBrah (talk) 23:11, 16 May 2013 (UTC)

I took what I added directly from the pages which were sourced. I do not understand the need to delete the Alternative Energy section, or the Capital Improvement plan section. It is not sensible to remove them, since they pertain to the school, and the information is not promotional in the least. And I merely moved the information regarding the music program from one website to Wikipedia, and I do not see how it should be regarded as "blatantly promotional". And on another note: the sections, such as administration, the music program, and distinguished teachers were fine for numerous months. You are the only person on Wikipedia that did not like and took offense to them. You must either be a depressed, old man, or you have something against Ponaganset High School. Thank you LORDDT01 (talk) 19:35, 17 May 2013 (UTC)

Article notability notification
Hello. This message is to inform you that an article that you wrote, Gillette News-Record, has been recently tagged with a notability notice. This means that it may not meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines. Please note that articles which do not meet these criteria may be merged, redirected, or deleted. Please consider adding reliable, secondary sources to the article in order to establish the topic's notability. You may find the following links useful when searching for sources:. Thank you for editing Wikipedia! VoxelBot 18:33, 24 May 2013 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Mei Misaki.png
 Thanks for uploading File:Mei Misaki.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. ww2censor (talk) 10:30, 28 July 2013 (UTC)

November 2013
I noticed the message you recently left to Jon Adamson. Please remember not to bite the newcomers. If you see someone make a common mistake, try to politely point out what they did wrong and how to correct it. Thank you. ''Info: I posted guides to the new user. If the article isn't fixed within 24 hours, the template could be restored.  Alex ''discussion ★ 19:38, 4 November 2013 (UTC)


 * An automated speedy deletion notification is biting the newcomers now? What a joke. Either way, the chances of this "unsigned singer"s article surviving are pretty much zero, let it have 24hrs or however long you want, not gonna make a difference. --BigPimpinBrah (talk) 19:47, 4 November 2013 (UTC)

Saurashtra region
It is not at all possible to trace the communities that have migrated or originated from Saurashtra. I know this because I am from Saurashtra. I have seen a lot more communities than described here, some of them I don't even know the names. Also, the communities described here are not actually the communities, these are surnames that are added as communities. If we were to write the surnames then these article would never end. And it would inappropriate to describe this in article where a person comes to find about Saurashtra and not the merely surnames of people. Hope you would understand. The only relavant information is about Siddis that have come from Africa who I have seen in Junagadh and have adopted local language. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nikhilvp 5 (talk • contribs) 09:18, 22 November 2013 (UTC)
 * I have reverted my edit, next time please use an edit summary because section blanking without an explanation will usually be assumed to be vandalism. --BigPimpinBrah (talk) 16:55, 22 November 2013 (UTC)

Inappropriate username
Please change your username, as it violates our username policy. You appear to be a good editor so you won't be blocked, but you need to be renamed. Andrevan@ 01:20, 24 November 2013 (UTC)

Your RfA !vote
I have redacted some personal information that you posted at Requests for adminship/TheAustinMan 2. I would like to remind you that it is not appropriate to post personal information about other users on-wiki; this is considered outing, and is extremely inappropriate. If you have any specific questions about why the information you posted was inappropriate, I'd prefer if you contact me by email. – GorillaWarfare (talk) 01:31, 24 November 2013 (UTC)

"Articles for creation/Jono Grant (Composer)"
Hello this is in reference to "Articles for creation/Jono Grant (Composer)" You rejected the article saying "This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified"

Everything in this article is 100% legit, I'm happy to go through and cite anything in the article but you don't say where the problems are. How do I correct it if I don't know what the exact issues are?

Is there a way to be more specific about your concerns? It's true I'm a beginner at this but I did work hard on it, please consider that.

Thanks Jono Grant — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jonogrant (talk • contribs) 18:23, 3 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Hi and thanks for the question. The only real problem with the current submission is it does not cite any reliable sources (IMDB is not usually reckoned a reliable source). Since on Wikipedia we limit ourselves to subjects of note, we require reliable sources to prove whether or not a subject is notable enough for inclusion in the encyclopedia. For example if the person in question was the subject of a newspaper or magazine article, you could use those sources to prove the subject's notability. You can also read WP:IRS to find out more about what sources would be good to use. --BigPimpinBrah (talk) 19:57, 3 December 2013 (UTC)

Okay, thank you, I'll try to get more reliable sources. I wondered about IMDB. JG — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jonogrant (talk • contribs) 01:28, 5 December 2013 (UTC)

Your RfA
My (unsolicited) advice is that you withdraw your RfA as soon as possible. You aren't qualified and I'm afraid you'll soon be seeing snow. John Reaves 05:29, 12 December 2013 (UTC)
 * I agree, and you should change your name voluntarily before I do it for you. Andrevan@ 05:55, 12 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Chill, the username obviously uses several layers of slang so before you unilaterally decide what the definition is, the guy gets to have a shot at explaining himself. If you are so concerned, open a RFC on his username.  Swinging the big hammer of 'cratship around isn't very becoming of the level headedness we expect of 'crats.  The community is capable of solving this one, you should back off and wait for it to do so and then you can use your rename tool, as your elevated rights are purposed for, when the time comes.  Besides, this is a good faith user and threats arn't needed.  Especially if no one has noticed until this user put himself in the spotlight in a good way.--v/r - TP 19:14, 12 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Your username change was probably a good idea both politically and probably morally. I hate seeing someone getting threatened, bullied really, into anything but it shows character on you to do the change nonetheless.--v/r - TP 19:41, 12 December 2013 (UTC)
 * It looks as if some of the username links on the RfA page itself now require updating in order for participants to evaluate your edits. Well done for the change, anyway. -- Trevj (talk · contribs) 19:58, 12 December 2013 (UTC)

Username warning
Welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that your username, "BigPimpinBrah", may not meet Wikipedia's username policy because it is potentially offensive and disruptive. If you believe that your username does not violate our policy, please leave a note here explaining why. As an alternative, you may ask for a change of username, or you may simply create a new account for editing. Thank you. --Jakob (Scream about the things I've broken) 12:46, 12 December 2013 (UTC)
 * "Welcome to Wikipedia"? Axl  ¤  [Talk]  18:26, 12 December 2013 (UTC)

Barnstar
I am surprised to see so many people objecting to your choice of username. On the other hand, given the depth of feeling and the apparent consensus, it would be sensible to do so. Best wishes. Axl ¤  [Talk]  18:25, 12 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Thank you :) --BigPimpinBrah (talk) 18:29, 12 December 2013 (UTC)


 * I'm kind of glad you did. It didn't mean much to me (being British) but changing it shows that you take the complaints seriously.  I like the new name too! Deb (talk) 13:08, 17 December 2013 (UTC)

A pie for you!
Thank you --JamesMoose (talk) 20:59, 13 December 2013 (UTC)