User talk:JamesPeters1980

If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:
 * 1) editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
 * 2) participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
 * 3) linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. ⬅ ⚠ Redvers dashing thru the snow ⚠ 14:26, 22 December 2009 (UTC)

Discussion
The article and your conflict of interest in editing it is subject to a discussion at our conflicts of interest noticeboard. You comments are welcome there. ⬅ ⚠ Redvers dashing thru the snow ⚠ 14:34, 22 December 2009 (UTC)

Sockpuppetry case
You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Sockpuppet investigations/KewQuorum for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page.--  At am a  頭 21:08, 22 December 2009 (UTC)

You have been. (blocked by –MuZemike 16:54, 29 December 2009 (UTC))

You may contest this block by adding the text below, but please read our guide to appealing blocks first.

JamesPeters1980 (talk) 12:57, 20 January 2010 (UTC)