User talk:JamesSoy

Welcome
Welcome!

Hello, JamesSoy, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! Studerby (talk) 00:42, 11 December 2009 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * Manual of Style

Policy
To include material of the nature that you recently added to Child sex tourism, you absolutely must supply a verifiable reliable source (click those words to see the relevant Wikipedia policies), such as a newspaper story. This is required by our policy on living people, and is a non-negotiable criteria for such material. Studerby (talk) 00:42, 11 December 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia etiquette
Please do not add content without citing verifiable and reliable sources. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you.

After finding an entire paragraph of unsourced material of dubious credibility in the article on Pericoronitis, I reviewed your edit history.

The few edits you have made have been bold, unsourced statements.

In particular, the unsupported accusation in the Child Sex Tourism article was a good example of an edit that is not done in good faith. Replacing this unsupported statement less than 1 hour after it was rightfully reverted is a good example bad faith actions that can lead to administrative actions against your account and/or IP address.

No one is perfect, but so far your edits are 0 out of 4 for being encyclopedic. Please review the links Studerby gave you before making more edits.--Bodybagger (talk) 05:51, 11 December 2009 (UTC)