User talk:James Callahan/Archive 3

Image tagging for Image:Daamit.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Daamit.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 03:10, 29 December 2006 (UTC)

Your edit to Advanced Micro Devices
Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Izaakb 15:34, 31 December 2006 (UTC)


 * It wasn't nonsense. It was an on-topic picture depicting public response to the merger. James Callahan 19:56, 31 December 2006 (UTC)

Your edit to ATF
Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising. You are, however, encouraged to add appropriate content to the encyclopedia. If you feel the material in question should be added to the article, then please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. See the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. Izaakb 15:35, 31 December 2006 (UTC)


 * I wasn't advertising anything. I don't own the site, I just found the link relevant. James Callahan 19:57, 31 December 2006 (UTC)

Your edit to Rastafari movement
Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Izaakb 15:38, 31 December 2006 (UTC)


 * You just assume every edit I make is vandalism, don't you? Mind you, I don't blame you since it's so prevalent, but at least give me the benefit of the doubt. James Callahan 19:57, 31 December 2006 (UTC)

Your edit to Spider web
Looking at your edit history, it appears that not every edit you make is vandalism, but far too many of them are. Please give some thought to the notion of growing up.

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. KarlBunker 02:34, 23 January 2007 (UTC)


 * Thank you for the suggestion. I shall consider growing up tomorrow, maybe after work. Have a nice day. James Callahan 02:39, 23 January 2007 (UTC)


 * It occurs to me that you may be laboring under a couple of innocent misimpressions: First, your edits indicate that you think of Wikipedia as being a kind of group blog where humor will be welcome. It isn't; people who contribute to WP are expected to take it seriously, and humor is not appreciated.
 * Secondly, you may be under the mistaken impression that your attempts at humor are in fact humorous. I'm afraid you're incorrect on that count as well. KarlBunker 02:56, 23 January 2007 (UTC)


 * Interesting how sarcastically you imply that sarcasm (and other forms of humor) are not tolerated. James Callahan 02:58, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

10mm Auto edit
Read Hansen v. Webster (http://www.firearmstactical.com/pdf/hansen_v_webster.pdf), where a female agent sued the FBI in part because "firearms training and testing screened out disproportionate numbers of female trainees". What in particular in the firearms training is discriminitory is summed up in this letter from Christine Hansen's attorney: http://www.thegunzone.com/ayoob/hansen_proceeding.pdf. More of Massad Ayoob's writing (he served as an expert witness for Hansen) on women and guns covers the specific issues, such as http://www.backwoodshome.com/articles/ayoob63.html. Big guns, long stocks and trigger reaches, and heavy recoil springs are all issues that will impact individuals with smaller builds and less hand strength, which on average will impact men more than women. There's been a lot of activity on that portion of the 10mm article recently, and it may be worthwhile to come up with a citation to back it up; do you think the references provided are sufficient to draw the conclusion? I know they aren't specific to the 10mm, but since the Hansen case was decided in 1981, prior to the development of the 10mm, it provided a significant incentive to downsize the power and size of the 10mm/1006 combination. scot 19:51, 16 February 2007 (UTC)


 * Actually, while I was trying to be encyclopedic by removing it, but I was also being somewhat facetious and sarcastic by calling it "hateful and offensive", because in reality I'm probably the most politically incorrect (or reasonable, depending on who you ask) person you'll meet. Yes, that citation will do fine. Thanks. James Callahan 01:53, 17 February 2007 (UTC)

Note
Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. EVula // talk // &#9775;  // 06:23, 19 February 2007 (UTC)

Sir Paul
Hi I saw your edit and thought I'd let you know that Macca is entitled to preface his name with Sir because he is a Knight Bachelor. Hope this helps. Cheers, Vera, Chuck &amp; Dave 10:50, 22 February 2007 (UTC)


 * That does help. Thank you. =D James Callahan 21:46, 22 February 2007 (UTC)


 * You're welcome. Vera, Chuck &amp; Dave 11:52, 23 February 2007 (UTC)

Dongle
Hilarious. Chris Cunningham 14:25, 26 February 2007 (UTC)


 * I'm glad someone appreciates my humor. James Callahan 16:45, 26 February 2007 (UTC)

Upstate New York's Statehood Movement being considered for deletion
I am sending you this notice because you have edited the article Upstate New York's Statehood Movement. This article is currently being considered for deletion under the AfD process. You participate in the discussion on this proposed deletion here. Thank you for your kind attention. Edivorce 19:21, 3 March 2007 (UTC)

Custom skin
Glad you like it. :) There are a few specific tweaks which I might need some help with: Default image background, white tabs and main menu. Ive been happy enough with it to not bother. Regards, -Ste|vertigo 06:07, 9 March 2007 (UTC)

Blocked
I have blocked this account indefinitely due to this edit. It looks at least possible that this account has been compromised and is now being used for vandalism. --Yamla 04:05, 6 May 2007 (UTC)

Needle in a haystack
Well, I saw your comment cause it appeared in recent changes... :-) Perhaps you'd consider improving a stub article you think is crap, instead of just posting a comment on it? Moyabrit 20:15, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
 * I would have but I wouldn't really know what to say. I just figured I'd comment on it to bring attention to it. perhaps a stub template is in order. James Callahan 21:16, 19 May 2007 (UTC)

Antarctic Treaty
Now, first of all, Side 6 actually got connections with both EF and Zeon, and both of their forces got bases inside Side 6 different colonies. Secondly, the colony asked for help from the Gray Phantom, because it is the nearest EFSF ship nearby, if you got attacked by Zeon, you'd figure it is pretty much useless to ask for help from the nearby Zeon ships, no? This is different from the WB case, where the Side 6 government did not ask for their help. Thirdly, the Zeon actually attacked the colony before Rubicon operation(which causes the crash of Bernie) as basic training(which makes Bernie a newbie who lost a Mobile Suit the first time he ever piloted one out for mission). All of these are from Gundam Officials, and thus should answer your questions. It is a very complicated situation in Side 6, they simply made use of their neutrality to do a lot of things that help/hurt both sides. And as long as they still have their own neutrality(even though protected by both forces when needed), they would welcome other military actions like developing MS within their border since they can somehow make a living off it. MythSearchertalk 14:14, 21 June 2007 (UTC)