User talk:James D. Baker

November 2023
Hello, I'm MrOllie. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. MrOllie (talk) 03:00, 25 November 2023 (UTC)


 * Hi MrOllie, didn't realize there was a place on wikipedia itself to talk before the most recent change. Changing "evolutionary biology" to "the theory of evolutionary biology" probably isn't the most constructive, so that's fair, however I think that calling creation science "psuedoscience" isn't being entirely fair, just curious about how you define psuedoscience and why you think it applies to creation science. On an unrelated note; how's your day going? James D. Baker (talk) 03:24, 25 November 2023 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. MrOllie (talk) 03:23, 25 November 2023 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Institute for Creation Research‎ shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.''This is because the IP edit appears to have been yours. You need to get consensus on the talk page now.'' Doug Weller  talk 08:27, 25 November 2023 (UTC)