User talk:James Patrick Conway

Welcome!
Malinaccier (talk • contribs) 22:39, 19 November 2007 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Rupert read requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Corvus cornix (talk) 23:01, 19 November 2007 (UTC)

Regarding edits to Rupert read
Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia, James Patrick Conway! However, your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove spam from Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert a good link, please accept my creator's apologies, but note that the link you added, matching rule ref=, is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. Please read Wikipedia's external links guidelines for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! AntiSpamBot (talk) 23:25, 19 November 2007 (UTC)

OK, I've taken the db tag off, but your edit made it sound like he was running for a party position. It doesn't say he's a candidate for the European Parliament. It also needs reliable sources. Corvus cornix (talk) 23:26, 19 November 2007 (UTC)

Dr Rupert Read is the lead candidate for the Eastern Region Green Party - That's very confusing. It should read something like Dr Rupert Read is an Eastern Region Green Party candidate for the European Parliament elections in 2009 or something like that. And if you're going to say "lead candidate", you'll have to provide a reliable source for that claim. Corvus cornix (talk) 23:35, 19 November 2007 (UTC)

Okay, I've added the references. Is this article okay now? Please let me know if it still needs improving. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.13.247.96 (talk) 07:57, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
 * OK, those refs help. Thanks.  Corvus cornix (talk) 18:47, 20 November 2007 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Rupert Read Main.JPG
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Rupert Read Main.JPG, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Kelly hi! 23:55, 24 January 2012 (UTC)