User talk:James Phantom

Welcome!
Hello, James Phantom, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
 * Introduction and Getting started
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Romaine (talk) 13:18, 11 November 2016 (UTC)
 * PS: The course page is at Benelux Education Program/Maastricht University/Autumn 2016.

Feedback on your article
Hello James Phantom, Thank you for writing your article in your sandbox! I have read the article and would like to give some feedback to improve your article to Wikipedia standards and customs. While your tutor will judge it content wise, I will look if it meets the quality standards we have on Wikipedia. I standard look for a series of subjects that need improvement or are okay. I hope you can implement this feedback to your sandbox article before our next meeting. Thanks! Romaine (talk) 15:45, 28 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Intro sentence: "is a term" not needed, just say "refers". No need to capitalise the C in "Social Capital".
 * Links: Add much more links, like "cultural capital", "economic capital", and others. Please look for keywords in your article and link them to other Wikipedia articles.
 * Headers: Please use second degree headers (== ... ==) instead of third degree headers (=== ... ===).
 * References: Use much more references: the common practise is to add a reference behind every two or three sentences. I see you use "Valenzuela et al.", but I have based on your article insufficient information to know the title of the work of this author. Please add! Also reform the the references with only an url to one with a title, author, date, publisher, etc. Please add references behind the dot, without a space before the reference. Please add under the header "References" the following:
 * Other: please more carefully, you forgot a lot of punctuation marks.
 * Ready to publish: because your article is about social capital, and the article Social capital already exists in Wikipedia, your article can't be published as we only have one article for a single subject. But I would recommend you to look for parts of your article that you can add to the existing article. This I think can be done near the end of coming session.
 * Hi James Phantom, Thank you for your message, I have a look at it now. I just changed a few details, but in general working with references has improved. One reference needs improved: the first one, you only use the title, no author, publisher, date of publishing, etc. Please add those! Romaine (talk) 11:44, 8 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Hi James Phantom, Thank you for your message! I do not know when exactly you have to submit it?
 * Intro sentence: okay
 * Links: okay
 * Headers: okay, besides I would suggest to change the header of "Illustration", just sounds strange to me.
 * References: In the first section, the second sentence (starting with Social capital is generally used...) I would like to so a reference behind, because "generally" can be a weasel word and tricky to use without reference. But the (p. 51) like additions behind sentences are not suitable for Wikipedia, those info should be in the reference itself.
 * I wish you great days ahead! Greetings - Romaine (talk) 13:53, 22 December 2016 (UTC)

A kitten for you!
here is a kitten

Kameell (talk) 13:47, 30 November 2016 (UTC) 