User talk:James Zhou2021

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (December 16)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Eagleash were:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:James Zhou2021/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:James Zhou2021/sandbox, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User:James_Zhou2021/sandbox Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Eagleash&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User:James_Zhou2021/sandbox reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Eagleash (talk) 22:01, 16 December 2021 (UTC)

Help with your draft
Hi James, I saw your draft at AfC and I think it has a lot of useful information which would benefit the live encyclopedia! I would love to work with you to bring it up to wiki standards. I took the liberty of editing your draft to address formatting and referencing issues.

The content still needs some work to tailor the article to Wikipedia's norms/standards, but I think first we should decide whether the end goal is to resubmit to AfC, or to use the information to transform the Higher Speed PON article, which already exists on the live encyclopedia. We can create redirect links from "50G PON" and "G.9804" to point to "Higher Speed PON" if appropriate.

PS: if you want to reply publicly here, you can ping me by placing  at the beginning of your reply, and   at the end. We can also converse via email if that's easier. Aeffenberger (talk) 22:00, 20 December 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:50-Gigabit-capable passive optical networks
Hello, James Zhou2021. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:50-Gigabit-capable passive optical networks, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:54, 29 October 2022 (UTC)