User talk:James tps

ISI
Hello James tps. You in your recent edits at Inter-Services Intelligence tried to add content without citing any reliable source (Please read Reliable Source Guideline). None of the sources you added are reliable enough to cite that information. Such exceptional claims need multiple high-quality sources to support it. Besides you may also like to know about Wikipedia's Edit Warring policy. (I am leaving a template message related to edit warring below) -- S M S   Talk 14:36, 3 December 2013 (UTC)

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be engaged in an edit war with one or more editors. Although repeatedly reverting or undoing another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, and often creates animosity between editors. Instead of edit warring, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. While edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you.