User talk:Jamesb1

License tagging for Image:Schoolfront mid.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Schoolfront mid.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Media copyright questions. 23:09, 1 January 2007 (UTC)

Lego Star Wars
Please do not add false information articles as you did to Lego Star Wars, if you do so you will be blocked from editing. Please consider editing constructively. Thanks. Gran2 19:33, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
 * This Gran2 16:23, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Perhaps I made a mistake. I was trying to remove the vandalism not add it. Check all my contributions. I don't add false information to articles.
 * I understand, as said I only said this because of such a time difference between the edits, just try and be more careful next time. Gran2 16:59, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Thanks, I'm sure that you yourself will make a first class editor. Happy editing! Gran2 10:27, 22 April 2007 (UTC)

Schools in Crewe
hello, I've noticed you've been editing Crewe, in particular, schools for Crewe. Some of the schools listed are not actually in Crewe, but are in adjacent civil parishes, such as the Haslington one. Given that there are separate articles (or potentially separate articles) for these places, I think it could be better to stick with schools that are mostly in the unparished central area of Crewe, and not in any adjacent parishes, as there is not any clear-cut idea of any boundaries of what might be called "Crewe Urban Area". The alternative is to make a note against all the ones that are in separate civil parishes in the sections you have been working on explaining that they are different parishes and even different villages. I think it wouled further improve what you have already done. I hope you agree with this. What do you think? DDStretch   (talk)  11:46, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

X3
Sorry man, it's just you accidentally removed the citation. My philosophy is no cites, no info. Alientraveller 15:44, 1 July 2007 (UTC)

Martin Carden
Why do you keep removing him from Holmes Chapel School? Fair enough first time, but this time there was citation!

All Around the World (record label)
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. -- neon white user page talk 23:09, 15 April 2008 (UTC)

The reason why the information was removed is because it is incorrect. All Saints have not signed to All Around The World. Shaznay Lewis is releasing a single with Wideboys, but not All Saints. If I'm wrong, please at a citation to prove it!! Jamesb1 (talk) 19:08, 16 April 2008 (UTC)


 * The information is perfectly correct and cited. see All Saints (band). All Saints are signed to the All Around the World as of Apr 2008. -- neon white  user page talk 21:49, 16 April 2008 (UTC)


 * OK, that's fair enough, you have a citation. I had no idea about this. The news isn't mentioned on the AATW website and so I assumed it to be inaccurate. I'd be more than welcome for you to check the history of the page to see my contributions. I have never knowingly vandalised the page at all. Jamesb1 (talk) 22:47, 16 April 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject The Apprentice UK
As a member of the above project, you may want to participate in the discussion here. Dalejenkins | 20:38, 1 September 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Le Chateau du Broutel
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Le Chateau du Broutel, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Magioladitis (talk) 20:18, 12 October 2008 (UTC)

Questionnaire
In an effort to assess the progress of Wikiproject Cheshire, it has been decided to send a questionnaire to members. To answer, please copy this questionnaire and paste your answers on the answer page. While participation is, of course, not compulsory, thoughtful answers will help the project to develop and improve. Thank you.


 * 1. The project is always looking for new members, so we want to find out which ways of attracting and approaching potential members work best. Do you remember how and why you joined?
 * Answer:


 * 2. How would you describe your involvement in the project? What activities do you undertake and how often do you edit Cheshire-related article?
 * Answer:


 * 3. Do you feel like you receive adequate support/contact from project members?
 * Answer:


 * 4. The project talk page is intended to be the hub of the project, where members discuss articles and help each other improving them. Until very recently it has been almost inactive, but do you check the project talk page?
 * Answer:


 * 4a. If the talk page was more active, would you get involved in discussions there?
 * Answer:


 * 5. When viewing Cheshire-related articles, are there any issues that have stood out as needing attention or frustrated you? (Traditional counties POV, poor coverage about a particular subject, vandalism going unnoticed etc)
 * Answer:


 * 6. Maintaining the Cheshire portal is one of the Cheshire WikiProject's main aims, providing a display of the best and most up to date articles that are part of the project. There is currently a drive to promote it to featured status, but input from a wide range of members is needed. Do you have the portal on your watchlist?
 * Answer:


 * 7. Would you be interesting in subscribing to a newsletter covering North West England, with details of work done by WikiProjects representing Cheshire, Greater Manchester, and Merseyside?
 * Answer:


 * 8. Finally, are there any improvements or initiatives you'd like to see WP:CHES undertake, or general comments you'd like to make?
 * Answer:

Liverpool F.C. wiki
Hello, I am the lead sysop on the Liverpool F.C. wiki. It is a wiki dedicated solely to Liverpool F.C.. We aim to make the ultimate database for the club we all love. Since adopting the incredibly inactive wiki about a month ago we have greatly increased the article count and modernized it from it's previous state. The problem is there are not many active members on the site and we need more for the site to properly grow. It is well organized and on it's way to be a great site we just need more editors to expand. It is based on Wikia's network of wikis. Like Wikipedia it is free to use and the editing process is exactly the same. If you know how to edit Wikipedia you will know how to edit the Liverpool F.C. wiki. Now for the question you may be asking yourself. Why edit there? Wikipedia has articles on Liverpool. This is true. At the Liverpool wiki it is all about Liverpool. We allow editors to edit anything about Liverpool no matter how trivial. We allow edits on reserve and academy players, and even things as trivial as the fitness coaches for the year 2011. We also do not lock pages to registered users. That means if you have something to say about Steven Gerrard you can click edit and not view source and actually write something. I would love for you to come by and check the wiki out. Feel free to edit any page. Every time you click edit your ARE helping this wiki grow. Thanks for taking the time to read this! http://liverpoolfc.wikia.com/wiki/Liverpool_FC_Wiki --Coffeeclub213 (talk) 17:26, 14 June 2011 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:55, 23 November 2015 (UTC)