User talk:Jamescoolman

August 2011
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Robert Douglas Hartmann. When removing content, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. –Davejohnsan (t/c) 06:07, 14 August 2011 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Users are expected to collaborate with others and avoid editing disruptively. In particular, the three-revert rule states that: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you continue to edit war, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Salvio  Let's talk about it! 11:19, 14 August 2011 (UTC)
 * 1) Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Salvio Let's talk about it! 11:33, 14 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Furthermore, please note that your "polite notice" was inappropriate and spammy; I understand that you may want to emphasise that a given company has nothing to do with a criminal, but, if your addition gets reverted, start discussing on the talk page, so that an acceptable wording may be worked out. Finally, assuming you might have a conflict of interest here, I'd like to invite you to read WP:COI. Salvio  Let's talk about it! 11:38, 14 August 2011 (UTC)