User talk:Jamescstyes

Hi James. I notice you've now removed from two separate editors reference to a negative story that has received significant news coverage in relation to Dr Dan Poulter. I'm worried this is affecting the 'Neutral Point of View' position of this article, particularly as the statement has been reported in multiple sources. (eg New Statesman / HSJ). Do you have any thoughts on how this part of the blogging community's discussion of Dr Poulter's career can be reflected on his Wiki without simply removing the statement for a second time? It seems you're potentially removing negative references placed on the wiki page, particularly as you've retained a 'promotional quote' from Dr Poulter which equally does not add to biographical achievement.

I do think a reference needs to be made to his 100 hour statement, as it was made to the House of Commons, and does show up easily when reading elsewhere online about his career. Would there be any way you're happy for this reference to be included? - eg an expanded section with the reference from the Hansard, and Dr Poulter's subsequent response. I didn't include this detail, as I thought it would change the weight of the article and over focus on it. Quesh 08:29, 19 September 2012 (UTC)

(Please ignore above - have now transferred discussion to Bio page as posted here by mistake. Attempted to delete, but Wiki disallowing as involves total delete of content - have flagged to helpdesk) — Preceding unsigned comment added by DrQuesh (talk • contribs) 08:54, 19 September 2012 (UTC)