User talk:Jamesdavis1992

Nomination of Ben Higham-Smith for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ben Higham-Smith is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Ben Higham-Smith until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Domdeparis (talk) 11:20, 29 November 2016 (UTC)

Managing a conflict of interest
Hello, Jamesdavis1992. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places, or things you have written about in the article Ben Higham-Smith, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic, and it is important when editing Wikipedia articles that such connections be completely transparent. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, we ask that you please:


 * avoid editing or creating articles related to you and your family, friends, school, company, club, or organization, as well as any competing companies' projects or products;
 * instead, you are encouraged to propose changes on the Talk pages of affected article(s) (see the request edit template);
 * when discussing affected articles, disclose your COI (see WP:DISCLOSE);
 * avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or to the website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
 * exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Please take a few moments to read and review Wikipedia's policies regarding conflicts of interest, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies. ''Hi you have mentioned in a talk page that you are closely connected to the subject of this article as you train with him and are meeting with him to discuss the article. WP:COI is very strongly discouraged as it is almost impossible to be neutral. You must make a full WP:DISCLOSURE of your relationship with this person and it would be advisable not to edit the biography of a close acquaintance.'' Domdeparis (talk) 09:00, 30 November 2016 (UTC)

Issuing level 1 warning about removing AfD template from articles before the discussion is complete. (Peachy 2.0 (alpha 8))
Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Ben Higham-Smith. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. This is an automated message from a bot about, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please report it.—cyberbot I  Talk to my owner :Online 10:28, 3 December 2016 (UTC)

December 2016
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you recently removed maintenance templates from Ben Higham-Smith. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. - TheMagnificentist (talk) 20:43, 4 December 2016 (UTC)

I'm ever so sorry! As far as I was aware, I resolved the problen that the template refers to. If you don't think I did, would you be ever so kind as to tell me where I went wrong? Thank you!
 * You removed the orphan tag when there were still no other articles linked. - TheMagnificentist (talk) 20:52, 4 December 2016 (UTC)