User talk:Jamesdeenblog

July 2012
Thank you for your interest in editing Wikipedia. Your edit to James Deen was successful, but because it was not considered beneficial to the page, the edit has been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment with editing, please use the sandbox instead. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. MikeWazowski (talk) 00:03, 10 July 2012 (UTC)

Wait a minute, let's hold on here and not be hasty throwing up templates and being antagonistic to a newcomer. The first question is, is the information accurate, and is it cited to an accurate and reliable source? I mean, if it's already out there someplace we can find it, then it's out there so that everybody can find it, whether we include it or not. But if the information is inactivate or the source is questionable, that's another matter. and if the information is accurate, well really, who cares? Are we really opening up the subject to some kind of harm by having this here? DeistCosmos (talk) 15:11, 10 July 2012 (UTC)

It is not public information it is not published anywhere but on this site and we dont want the information on here get it
 * I don't know who 'we' is, but if you look at the link at Talk:James Deen apparently it was published in US Weekly.... DeistCosmos (talk) 23:55, 10 July 2012 (UTC)