User talk:Jamesdragons

University of Worcester
Your work on updating the University of Worcester article is excellent, especially providing  references for all  the unsourced items. When providing references, do take a look  at  the MOS (see above) to  see how they  should be inserted to  display  correctly  in  the references section  of the article - there is a way  to  do  this without  them showing  as naked URLs, and the retrieval  date should also  be provided. There is a template for doing this, although I personally  prefer to  do it  manually - it's just as quick. Do also  remember to  provide a detailed edit summary  of each  of your edits, and if you can, make your edits in  your sandbox and then post  them  all in one go  to  save cluttering  the Version History list. If you are very  concerned about  university  articles or Worcestershire articles, you  may  wish  to  join the respective Wikipdia projects. By doing  so, you  can keep  abreast  of other articles that  need urgent  attention of the kind  you  provide so  well. You can  find links to  the projects on  the large banner at  the top of each  article's talk page.--Kudpung (talk) 02:55, 26 December 2009 (UTC)


 * Hi Jamesdragons. new information regarding  recent developments on the University  of Worcester page have been posted here: Talk:University of Worcester. if you  have time, please review these changes and update anything  you  find to  be not  quite correct. I am guilty  of corrupting  my  usual policy of grouping my  edits into one posting to avoid cluttering  the version  history, but  in this case, due to the need to carry out  many  comparisons without  connection  time-outs, it  was not  possible.--Kudpung (talk) 04:14, 14 January 2010 (UTC)


 * USE OF  IMAGES: Whilst  I  wouldn't for a moment  want  to  discourage you from your excellent  continued attention  to  the University of Worcester article, I  must  point  out that the images you  uploaded on  26 January  and linked to  the article are lacking  in  even the basic information  required concerning  WP:FUR and copyright  templates. New images a re patrolled by  bots and there will  be nothing  much you  can do about  them  being  deleted unless you  get  in first and complete the iunformation required on the upload page, with of course, accurate and verifiable details.--Kudpung (talk) 15:35, 26 January 2010 (UTC)

Worcs Uni
Hi James; I saw your recent  comment  on  the Uni  talk  page and have reacted accordingly. Perhaps we should ask for some level of page protection so  that  only  registered users can edit  it,  or ask for a temporary  IP  block. If you have time, please read this: WP:SILVERLOCK, and see if it  meets the criteria for semi protection in  view of its history. What do  you  think? --Kudpung (talk) 01:36, 2 October 2010 (UTC)