User talk:Jamesgpeck

December 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. One or more of the external links you added in this edit to the page Tractor do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. You may wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Q T C 16:05, 2 December 2009 (UTC)

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did in this edit to Challenger Tractor. Inappropriate links include links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that serve as advertising or promotion. Thank you. Q T C 16:12, 2 December 2009 (UTC)

Signatures in articles
Howdy - I notice you've included your signature in a number of recent edits to the article on AGCO. While is encouraged that you sign contributions to discussions on talk pages (like this one), it's customary to leave them out of the encyclopaedia articles themselves. Don't worry - people will knwo whihc bits your wrote as this is recorded in the articles edit history. - TB (talk) 23:53, 2 December 2009 (UTC)

Severstal articles
I have changed Severstal Columbus and Severstal Dearborn to redirects, as they seem unlikely to be notable on their own. It probably would make more sense to have a section on each site at the Severstal North America article. Regards! VQuakr (talk) 07:04, 4 April 2011 (UTC)

April 2011
Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I've noticed that you have been adding your signature to some of your edits to articles. This is a common mistake to make and has probably already been corrected. There is no need to sign your edits to article content, as the article's edit history serves the function of attributing contributions, so you only need to use your signature to make discussions more readable, such as on article talk pages or project pages such as the Village Pump. If you would like further information about distinguishing types of pages, please see What is an article?. Again, thank you for contributing, and enjoy your Wikipedia experience! Thank you. VQuakr (talk) 07:41, 4 April 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of JobShopLean


The article JobShopLean has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "unreferenced neologism"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) (talk) 23:04, 1 June 2021 (UTC)