User talk:Jamesjpk/ArchiveApril2017

Speedy deletion nomination of Aphmau


A tag has been placed on Aphmau, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
 * It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Business for more information.
 * It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. SorryNotSorry ✽ ✉  06:27, 31 March 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Template:Aphmau


A tag has been placed on Template:Aphmau, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. SorryNotSorry ✽ ✉  06:29, 31 March 2017 (UTC)

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

 * Hi Jamesjpk! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission.  I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.
 * The Wikipedia Adventure Start Page
 * The Wikipedia Adventure Lounge
 * The Teahouse new editor help space
 * Wikipedia Help pages

-- 05:32, Saturday, April 1, 2017 (UTC)

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

 * Hi Jamesjpk! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission.  I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.
 * The Wikipedia Adventure Start Page
 * The Wikipedia Adventure Lounge
 * The Teahouse new editor help space
 * Wikipedia Help pages

-- 05:37, Saturday, April 1, 2017 (UTC)

Your question
Hello! In #wikipedia-en-help, you asked about finding sources for Aphmau and exceptions to the notability guidelines. The answer to your question about exceptions is both yes and no. The general notability guideline covers all articles, and requires significant coverage in reliable sources independent of the subject. However, since you're writing about a creative professional, WP:NARTIST and WP:ENTERTAINER apply. Now, I'll caution you that when you look at WP:ENTERTAINER, you will see Has a large fan base or a significant "cult" following. Subscriber numbers are an indication of a large fan base, but aren't usually enough if an article is taken to a deletion discussion. If you're having trouble finding sources, it's probably because your subject isn't ready for a Wikipedia article just yet. --AntiCompositeNumber (Leave a message) 01:32, 2 April 2017 (UTC)

Wikiproject Spoken Wikipedia Revival
Hello, I'm Jamesjpk. I wanted to let you know that the Wikiproject Spoken Wikipedia, has been tagged with a semi-active tag. I am messaging you about this because you are listed under the wiki-project's list of active participants. Please contribute to the WikiProject if you want to keep it alive! I hope that it becomes active again! Jamesjpk (talk) 22:25, 9 April 2017 (UTC)

MfD nomination of Draft:Aphmau
Draft:Aphmau, a page which you created or substantially contributed to (or which is in your userspace), has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Aphmau and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You are free to edit the content of Draft:Aphmau during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. -- RoySmith (talk) 11:28, 13 April 2017 (UTC)

Famousbirthdays.com is not a reliable source
Hi Jamesjpk. I'm in the process of removing famousbirthdays.com as a source from Wikipedia, because it's not reliable (See Reliable_sources/Noticeboard/Archive_153). I noticed that you've added it, and wanted to make sure you understood why it's being removed. If you disagree, let's discuss it. Thanks. --Ronz (talk) 16:45, 14 April 2017 (UTC)

April 2017
Hi Jamesjpk. We appreciate your enthusiasm but please refrain from tagging articles for now – some maintenance tasks are not suitable for beginners. New Page Review requires significant experience, which you don't have yet. However, if you have already made at least 200 mainspace edits, you can enroll at the Counter Vandalism Academy to learn about keeping pages free of nonsense. Consider doing recent changes patrol for vandalism instead. If you have any questions, don't hesitate to ask me on my talk page. KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I've been doing 01:00, 15 April 2017 (UTC) KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I've been doing 01:00, 15 April 2017 (UTC)

Talkback message from Tito Dutta
Tito Dutta (talk) 11:00, 16 April 2017 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Maltipoo
Hello! Your submission of Maltipoo at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! — Maile (talk) 01:10, 19 April 2017 (UTC) — Maile  (talk) 01:10, 19 April 2017 (UTC)

WikiProject:SpokenWikipedia
Hi, just letting you know that I came up with those rules and the project was totally inactive until I came along, so I would greatly appreciate it if next you don't template me and just post a reminder instead of a template. Thanks. Sparkling Pessimist  Scream at me!  00:46, 15 April 2017 (UTC)
 * I know everyone has their preferences, but I don't know them, and I find the template of being an easy way of notifying users. I also was not aware of you creating the rules, and even if you did, the text said to notify users. If you want other users to know your preference, please leave a message at the top of your talk page. Thanks Jamesjpk (talk) 00:52, 15 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes, but you're supposed to post the reminder and then delete the recording after waiting two weeks. Sparkling Pessimist   Scream at me!  01:22, 15 April 2017 (UTC)
 * It was already well over 2 weeks from the recording message. That is why I felt that I needed to set the reminder and delete right away. I understand the policy is to wait two weeks, however you were not reminded or messaged about the old message. It was over a month and it was old. I was doing cleanup that would be helpful. I notified you that I was doing cleanup with that template. 03:04, 15 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Sorry about my last few messages, looking at them, I seem pretty rude. Sorry something was going on in real life. I will refrain from posting more of these "rude" messages. Can you tel me how I could do better next time I want to delete old entries? Jamesjpk (talk) 03:21, 15 April 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Aphmau


A tag has been placed on Draft:Aphmau, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion,. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discusion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Rlin8 (talk) 22:56, 21 April 2017 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Maltipoo
Hello! Your submission of Maltipoo at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Skr15081997 (talk) 04:26, 24 April 2017 (UTC)

Talkback message from Tito Dutta
Tito Dutta (talk) 08:41, 29 April 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Kindergarten (video game) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kindergarten (video game) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Kindergarten (video game) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Lordtobi ( &#9993; ) 09:26, 29 April 2017 (UTC)
 * James, I don't know why but according to the edit history on the Afd to you seem to have removed the Video games deletion sorting tag that I applied to it, as well the category for the discussion under Games. I'm going to assume good faith that you are not trying to restrict broader discussion at Afd. I've restored the deletion sorting: please don't remove it again. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 23:14, 29 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Sorry! I didn't realize I did that. Thank you for pointing out my mistake. I'll look at my edit history later and see where I went wrong. Thanks! Jamesjpk (talk) 23:28, 29 April 2017 (UTC)