User talk:Jamesklett

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that you recently removed some content without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Materialscientist (talk) 03:40, 13 December 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Bone Box (Book)
Hello Jamesklett,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Bone Box (Book) for deletion, because it seems to be inappropriate for a variety of reasons.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Dan Koehl (talk) 02:05, 14 December 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Bone Box (Book)


A tag has been placed on Bone Box (Book), requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
 * It is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. (See section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Wikipedia has standards for the minimum necessary information to be included in short articles; you can see these at Wikipedia:Stub. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
 * It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Jamesklett (talk) 02:23, 14 December 2014 (UTC)


 * As reviewing administrator, I have declined the speedy-deletion nomination for this page. No, it wasn't a robot error, it was a human error, because neither of the reasons cited applies to a page like this. However, the article is still not appropriate, and I have proposed it for deletion - formal notice below. The reason is that Wikipedia is not a place for authors to publicise their new books:
 * Wikipedia is quite selective about subjects for articles. The general inclusion criterion is called Notability, and the standard for books is explained at WP:Notability (books)
 * Also, people are strongly discouraged from writing about themselves or about any subject where they have a WP:Conflict of interest, see also the WP:Plain and simple conflict of interest guide.
 * The WP:Welcome page and the WP:Introduction will tell you more about Wikipedia. JohnCD (talk) 14:22, 14 December 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Bone Box (Book)


The article Bone Box (Book) has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * No references supplied, no indication that this meets the notability standard of WP:Notability (books).

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JohnCD (talk) 14:20, 14 December 2014 (UTC)