User talk:Jameskramer

Gibson CS-336
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Gibson CS-336, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.guitarvillage.co.uk/product-detail.asp?id=8678. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.)

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 03:45, 30 March 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Gibson CS-336
A tag has been placed on Gibson CS-336 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. RadioFan (talk) 03:54, 30 March 2010 (UTC)


 * I agree with the assessment and have deleted the article as most parts were simply copypasted from the sources given. Please pay special attention to what was said above: You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.
 * You're free to start again, but write the article in your own words, using said sources to back your statements. Regards, –MuZemike 02:37, 31 March 2010 (UTC)