User talk:Jameslionelprice

 Hi Jameslionelprice, and Welcome to Wikipedia!  Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page — I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.

--- Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:


 * Table of Contents


 * Department directory

Need help?


 * Questions — a guide on where to ask questions.
 * Cheatsheet — quick reference on Wikipedia's mark-up codes.


 * Wikipedia's 5 pillars — an overview of Wikipedia's foundations
 * The Simplified Ruleset — a summary of Wikipedia's most important rules.

How you can help:


 * Contributing to Wikipedia — a guide on how you can help.


 * Community Portal — Wikipedia's hub of activity.

Additional tips...


 * Please sign your messages on talk pages with four tildes ( ~ ). This will automatically insert your "signature" (your username and a date stamp). The [[Image:Button sig2.png]] button, on the tool bar above Wikipedia's text editing window, also does this.


 * If you would like to play around with your new Wiki skills the Sandbox is for you.
 * If you'd like to tell us about yourself and meet other new users, be sure to introduce yourself at our new user log.

 Good luck, and have fun. Signed by Wolverenesst c 05:45, 13 November 2007 (UTC) Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. -- Signed by Wolverenesst c 05:45, 13 November 2007 (UTC)

Re: Halo 3
And Game Rankings has 82 reviews, including that of "Wazap" and Metacritic actually has 74, which also includes Wazap reviews... so I fail to see the need to add it except an excuse to call it top 360 game which is false and a clear indication of bias. If thats not your intention that I have to again ask why the need to put it up? Stabby Joe (talk) 20:24, 26 November 2007 (UTC)


 * Fair enough, I won't accuse but te fact that Wazap doesn't seem to be even closely renound or well known as Metacritic and Game Rankings both always listed in recpetion sections, why should we list this site so suddenly? It only has 5 reviews, reviews which can be found on both sites and thus makes it not only a flawed system but also nothing remarkable or relevent enough to mention. I mean does this sound right: "It is 5th at Game Rankings based on 82 reviews whereas 1 at Wazap based on only 5 of the reviews from Game Rankings". Doesn't make sense or stack up as a good indication of how positive reviews were. Its been covered, so like most Halo 3 edittors, reception has now been left and done with. Stabby Joe (talk) 22:15, 26 November 2007 (UTC)