User talk:Jamesmcburnie

Welcome...

Hello, Jamesmcburnie, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: Introduction The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Help How to write a great article Manual of Style

Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place  on your talk page and ask your question there.

Please do not add copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Somno (talk) 03:34, 7 January 2009 (UTC)

31 North 62 East (film)
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of 31 North 62 East (film), and it appears to be a substantial copy of http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1235404. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 03:33, 7 January 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of The Deep Below (film)
A tag has been placed on The Deep Below (film) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Somno (talk) 03:35, 7 January 2009 (UTC)

Copyright violation in Shadows from the Sky (film)
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Shadows from the Sky (film), by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Shadows from the Sky (film) is unquestionably copyright infringement, and no assertion of permission has been made. To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Shadows from the Sky (film), please affix the template to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that '''this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here''' CSDWarnBot (talk) 03:40, 7 January 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Gadgetman (film)
A tag has been placed on Gadgetman (film) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Somno (talk) 03:44, 7 January 2009 (UTC)

Please note.
A user who repeatedly, despite warning, places copyrighted material on Wikipedia is liable to be blocked very quickly - we are based on free-use content, do not pay copyright reproduction fees to individual authors, and cannot afford regular lawsuits (and must act pre-emptively - by blcoking/banning if need be, by clear rules hopefully that people will follow before that becomes necessary.)

These articles, even if the content belongs to IMDB and you have provable permission to use them, are even so unusable as articles - please read Wikipedia:How to edit a page and other parts of the introduction that was posted above (pointpointpointpoint) to turn free-use content from several sources - into the beginnings of articles. That, rather than copies of brief snatches from somewhere, is what we're 'bout. Have a look at the articles people have written about movies already --

almost anything in the Category:2004 films (for films made in 2004) just for some examples... - seeing what others have already done, and checking the Featured Article section to see what's considered the best film-related articles on the site, will give better guidance than I possibly could. This site can be a whole lot of fun when following the rules, paradoxically, or so I've found - people read your articles all over the place (and because you'll be doing them well, in several senses, after practice, you'll know they aren't under constant threat of deletion either)

Best! Schissel | Sound the Note! 03:52, 7 January 2009 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with File:Jenniferlien.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Jenniferlien.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like PD-self (to release all rights), (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 19:03, 12 January 2009 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:Jennifer at 1996 Convention.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Jennifer at 1996 Convention.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. dave pape (talk) 05:23, 24 February 2009 (UTC)

License tagging for File:Gates-McFadden2007.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Gates-McFadden2007.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 02:05, 5 June 2009 (UTC)