User talk:Jamie5123

November 2011
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Catholicism, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.
 * Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Catholicism was changed by Jamie5123 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.953827 on 2011-11-05T19:17:31+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 19:17, 5 November 2011 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Catholicism. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. The reverted edit can be found [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=459179426 here].  pluma  Ø  19:19, 5 November 2011 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Catholic Church, you will be blocked from editing. Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Catholic Church was changed by Jamie5123 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.867582 on 2011-11-05T19:22:41+00:00. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 19:22, 5 November 2011 (UTC)

This is your last warning. You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Trent College. ArglebargleIV (talk) 19:29, 5 November 2011 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. JohnCD (talk) 20:01, 5 November 2011 (UTC)

I have corrected your unblock request, and as I blocked you I will leave it for another administrator to consider. However, you should realise that your whole editing history is preserved (click on "User contributions" at the left to see it), and shows that this account was created at 19:15 on 5 November, made its first vandal edit just two minutes later, over the next eleven minutes made three more edits, all vandalism, and then was blocked. So your story of being hacked does not stand up. JohnCD (talk) 21:46, 21 January 2012 (UTC)
 * You should keep in mind that misusing the unblock template can be construed as disruptive and could result in the loss of your ability to edit this page. I strongly urge that you read WP:GAB before posting anothe unblock request.  Tide  rolls  22:05, 21 January 2012 (UTC)

The unblock request was written in terms which appear to me to be taking the piss, which means that that request is itself vandalism. Repeating the same request verbatim adds to that impression. I conclude that letting you continue to have talk page access is unlikely to produce any result other than wasting our time, so talk page access ha disappeared. Goodbye. JamesBWatson (talk) 22:07, 21 January 2012 (UTC)