User talk:JamieSI

Regarding edits to World of Warcraft
Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia, JamieSI! However, your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove spam from Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert a good link, please accept my creator's apologies, but note that the link you added, matching rule strategyinformer\.com, is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. Please read Wikipedia's external links policy for more information. If the link was to an image, please read Wikipedia's image tutorial on how to use a more appropriate method to insert the image into an article. If your link was intended to promote a site you own, are affiliated with, or will make money from inclusion in Wikipedia, please note that inserting spam into Wikipedia is against policy. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! Shadowbot 08:50, 27 March 2007 (UTC)

February 2011
Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you.  Chimpanzee+  Us &#124; Ta &#124; Co 12:40, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Hi. Thanks for your reply. However, the issue is that you appear to have a conflict of interest. Your username and edits suggest you have an interest in strategyinformer.com. All of your edits added unnecessary links to strategyinformer.com to video game-related articles. The references were unnecessary as, in all cases, they either didn't serve to cite any specific part of the article or the information was already reliably sourced elsewhere. Because of this, it looks like the main aim of your edits was to promote the website, rather than improve the encyclopaedia. Wiki guidelines state that "Excessive self-citation is strongly discouraged" and that editors should avoid linking to their own organisation's website. Please keep this in mind when editing Wikipedia in future and avoid making any edits which mention strategyinformer.com. I hope that clarifies things? Cheers,  Chimpanzee+  Us &#124; Ta &#124; Co 16:31, 3 February 2011 (UTC)

April 2011
Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia. While objective prose about beliefs, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not intended to be a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you.  Chimpanzee+  Us &#124; Ta &#124; Co 17:06, 4 April 2011 (UTC)

July 2011
This is your last warning; the next time you insert a spam link, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted, preventing anyone from linking to them from all Wikimedia sites as well as potentially being penalized by search engines.  Chimpanzee+  Us &#124; Ta &#124; Co 18:24, 25 July 2011 (UTC)