User talk:Jamieleshaw

Welcoming Users
Hi Jamie. I notice you have been welcoming a lot of new users recently. While this is nice, posting welcomes to users who may not ever edit Wikipedia clogs up the servers, occupies unnecessary space and is not generally needed. While your kindness is appreciated, perhaps save the welcomes to users who have already made a few good-faith edits? &raquo; \ / (⁂ | ※) 09:58, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Absolutely, welcoming a user who has made good-faith edits is a great way to introduce them to the community. &raquo; \ / (⁂ | ※) 10:43, 9 January 2009 (UTC)

Thank you
Thanks for welcoming me. I intend to make occasional edits in articles about India. Riceplate Reddy (talk) 10:55, 8 January 2009 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 16:34, 6 February 2009 (UTC)

OpenCart
I have no objection if you want to AfD this, but I'm not comfortable with a speedy deletion when a recent AfD reached "no consensus". (Watchlisting) - Dank (push to talk) 03:44, 20 May 2009 (UTC)

Tagging for speedy deletion
Hi Jamieleshaw. Thank you for your work on patrolling pages and tagging for speedy deletion. I just wanted to inform you that I declined to delete Survival Sunday, a page that you tagged for speedy deletion under criterion A7 because of the following concern: A7 does not apply to terms and phrases and even if it did, it only applies when there is no possibility that an article might meet notability guidelines. Here there were reliable sources in the article to indicate that it might. Please review the criteria for speedy deletion and especially what is considered Non-criteria. In future you should rather tag such pages for proposed deletion or start an appropriate deletion discussion. Regards  So Why  13:05, 24 May 2009 (UTC)

Help
Please revert my edit to the Santa Maria, Bulacan artlicle! I can't undo it! --Secaundis • (myTalk) • (myContribs) 01:40, 25 May 2009 (UTC)

What did you do?, it says something about blacklisting.--Jamie Shaw (talk) 03:17, 25 May 2009 (UTC)

Please
Please do something to the article! Pls!--Secaundis • (myTalk) • (myContribs) 03:53, 25 May 2009 (UTC)

SOmeone else has fixed it I tryed too but would not let me--Jamie Shaw (talk) 07:14, 25 May 2009 (UTC)

WHAT UP? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dean Bailey (talk • contribs) 01:38, 28 May 2009 (UTC)

Not much. Remember to sign your comments with 4 tildes--Jamie Shaw (talk) 02:10, 28 May 2009 (UTC)

Copyright problems with James Norman Kirby
Hello. Concerning your contribution, James Norman Kirby, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). As a copyright violation, James Norman Kirby appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. James Norman Kirby has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:


 * If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at with a link to where we can find that note.
 * If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. Cuddy Wifter (talk) 04:23, 13 June 2009 (UTC)