User talk:Jamielikenigas

October 2016
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Beat Sneak Bandit, you may be blocked from editing. Dat GuyTalkContribs 20:06, 28 October 2016 (UTC)

Your account has been blocked indefinitely because it is being used only for vandalism. Furthermore, your username is a blatant violation of our username policy, meaning that it is profane; threatens, attacks or impersonates another person; or suggests that your intention is not to contribute to the encyclopedia (see our blocking and username policies for more information). We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia, but users are not allowed to edit with inappropriate usernames and we do not tolerate 'bad faith' editing such as trolling or other disruptive behavior. If you think there are good reasons why these don't describe your account, or why you should be unblocked, you are welcome to appeal this block – read our guide to appealing blocks to understand more about unblock requests, and then add the text at the end of your user talk page.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   20:08, 28 October 2016 (UTC)


 * I'm somewhat interested in why you keep protesting that you aren't a sockpuppet. So far as I can see, you're the only other on this page to mention the term. Peridon (talk) 21:15, 29 October 2016 (UTC)

Peridon I am protesting that because i was involved in a sock puppet case which is now closed when in fact after doing more research i have found out that i am not one. this is my only account and the evidence for me actually being one is weak and in fact is not true. This is my only account and i am being falsely accused of being a sock puppet.
 * Actually, nobody ever accused _this_ account of that. But since you insisted, I ran a WP:CHECKUSER and discovered, why, indeed, you are indeed an abuser of multiple accounts. Thank you for making this easy. --jpgordon&#x1d122;&#x1d106; &#x1D110;&#x1d107; 04:44, 30 October 2016 (UTC)