User talk:Jamierson2k


 * }

Speedy deletion nomination of Mixed Employment


A tag has been placed on Mixed Employment, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be unambiguous advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item G11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add  on the top of Mixed Employment and leave a note on |the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from independent reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Rorshacma (talk) 17:11, 22 March 2011 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from a page you have created yourself. If you do not believe the page should be deleted, you can place a tag on the page, under the existing speedy deletion tag (please do not remove the speedy deletion tag), and make your case on the page's talk page. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you.Rorshacma (talk) 17:32, 22 March 2011 (UTC)

March 2011
Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Mixed Employment. Please use the template on the page instead if you disagree with the deletion, and make your case on the page's talk page. Thank you. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 17:35, 22 March 2011 (UTC)

Mixed Employment
Hi. I've deleted Mixed Employment, because Wikipedia is not for promoting ideas that you are working on yourself, it is for writing about things that are already notable and have been covered by independent reliable source - have a look at WP:N and WP:RS for more information. It is also generally considered to not be a good idea to write about yourself or your own ideas, as that can constitute a conflict of interest - should your concept ever become sufficiently notable for a Wikipedia entry, I'm sure someone will come along and write it in due course. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 17:40, 22 March 2011 (UTC)

And I've just deleted it again - please do not recreate it again, or you may end up being blocked from editing -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 17:42, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Oh, and please read the links I gave you above, so that you can understand what is needed for a topic to qualify for a Wikipedia article - a new thing that you are just launching does not qualify -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 17:45, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
 * And I've now put a Welcome message at the top of this page - it has lots of useful links, including some for pages that help you learn about creating articles -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 17:47, 22 March 2011 (UTC)