User talk:Jamiewazere

test test :P

List of street artists
Hi. Please write an article on the street artist first, before adding them to List of street artists. There really is no point in them being on the list if the reader can't click through to an article to read about them, and the existence of the article demonstrates that they are notable. Thanks. -- Escape Orbit (Talk) 15:41, 24 August 2016 (UTC)

August 2016
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  05:48, 25 August 2016 (UTC)
 * I've blocked you because after taking a look at your edits I can't really see where you've made that many beneficial edits. Most of your edits have been things like this, this, this, and this, which looks like pretty deliberate disruption. You recently created an article that was at best written in a humorous tone but at worst suggests that you're here to do more nonsense. Even if you didn't think that your edits were all that bad, adding intentional nonsense is still vandalism and still requires that someone fix them, which is time they could've spent on something else. You might be able to be unblocked, but you'd have to explain why you did what you did and why it is seen as disruptive. You'd also have to give us an example of how you would edit Wikipedia in a beneficial fashion and overall convince us that we can trust you to make good edits in the future. So far you've really not made that many edits that could be seen as non-vandalism and even then they were still a little disruptive, although I'll assume that you might have made these edits to Rocket League in good faith. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  05:55, 25 August 2016 (UTC)
 * This is kind of why it's never a good idea to vandalize Wikipedia because if you do decide that you want to start editing more seriously, it can come back to haunt you in the end. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  05:57, 25 August 2016 (UTC)


 * The problem is, you were already sort of given a chance when you weren't blocked outright for your prior edits. You claim that you're here to edit responsibly, but your basic first edits of 2016 were to create a joke entry. It also doesn't matter how frequently you vandalized, the point is that you still vandalized and we've had plenty of people who are infrequent vandals. You don't seem to really understand why this was bad or really why an article calling a person a haggis would be seen as unhelpful on a website aimed at providing encyclopedic entries. You still don't seem to be taking any of this seriously, which is why you're still blocked as of this post. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  08:36, 31 August 2016 (UTC)


 * I have to point out that you don't have to convince "one admin that did not fully understand my attempted edits". You have to convince one of several separate admins that, if they had been in my place, would have almost certainly blocked you for the exact same reasons. I'm concerned that earlier in this unblock request you claim that you understand the reasons for your block and can even list them out individually, yet later in the same request your writing gives off the impression via the "one admin that did not fully understand my attempted edits" that the reason for your block was that I couldn't understand the reasoning and logic behind your edits - that they weren't vandalism but just you expressing your viewpoints and using slang. The average person coming on to Wikipedia is at least passing aware that the site isn't a place to use slang terms and joke around. To me this shows that you still aren't accepting responsibility for your edits, despite you trying to say otherwise. I'm sorry, but your edits don't show that you're here to edit Wikipedia in a responsible manner and you trying to shift the blame, even partially, by saying that I didn't understand your slang doesn't really show that you should be trusted, given that you don't really have any edits (or edit summary comments) to really show that we should believe otherwise. My recommendation for any admin coming into this is that if you decline this (which I heavily recommend) that you revoke talk page access or alert myself and I can do it. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  05:40, 5 September 2016 (UTC)

September 2016
 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. Your ability to edit your talk page has also been revoked. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  05:28, 20 September 2016 (UTC)
 * The prior request was denied, I think that three requests are enough and I'm blocking talk page access. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  05:29, 20 September 2016 (UTC)