User talk:Jamilahmadgondal

At the website of Pakistan Social Democratic Platform there is no information in being a political party striving after participation in the next elections. It is not clear if there are any non-virtual members beside the founder of the platform. For both reasons the platform doesn't belong at the List of political parties in Pakistan. Electionworld 06:26, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Please do not edit my user page. IF you want to discuss something, do it on User talk:Electionworld or even better Talk:List of political parties in Pakistan. I will remove the PSDP again since there is no indication at all that it is a political party. It might be wise that you provide information about the number of non-virtual members, the number of branches in Pakistan and the elections the PSDP took part in. Try to convince people that it is a political party before you re-add the PSDP at the list. Electionworld 11:09, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)


 * I second this request - please don't add your comments to my user page; the talk page serves this purpose. And I am afraid I will nominate an article about "Pakistan Social Democratic Platform" for deletion every time it is recreated; it has been nearly unanimously decided that it doesn't belong to Wikipedia because there is no evidence that this group has achieved anything significant, or that it even exists. Your comment ("Please don't remove Pakistan Social Democratic Platform, its still in the process.") in fact only proves that. Wikipedia is not a place for political propagation. - Mike Rosoft 12:53, 10 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Recreated content
Please do not recreate articles that have been deleted according to policy. The "Pakistan Social Democratic Platform" article was deleted by VfD consensus. Please do not recreate it again. Thank you. SWAdair | Talk 05:25, 10 Jun 2005 (UTC)

PSDP is not a Political Propagation its a Party.
PSDP membership raised over sixty at Yahoo! and MSN together. Therefore a Platform is now named as a Pakistan Socialist Democratic Party. Pakistan Social Democratic Platform was formed in August 11, 2003 it is converted into a party in June 11, 2005.
 * The question is what is a party. A definition is given at political party. I do not see in what way this virtual organization is a political party. Electionworld 05:50, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * The question is what is the progress in technology. A definition is given at sciences. I do not see that understanding of politics,information media and technology. User:jamilahmadgondal, June 19, 2005
 * Whether or not you choose to call your organization a political party, it still didn't achieve anything of note (such as running a candidate in elections). As I said, Wikipedia is not a place for political propagation; your organization may not be propagation, but your article is. - Mike Rosoft 15:12, 29 November 2005 (UTC)

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:PSDP.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:PSDP.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, we also need to know the terms of the license that the copyright holder has published the file under, usually done by adding a licensing tag. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created [ in your upload log]. Unsourced and untagged files may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the file will be deleted 48 hours after 16:07, 14 June 2010 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Image Screening Bot (talk) 16:07, 14 June 2010 (UTC) Created by Jamil Ahmad Gondal (PSDP) Chairperson.

File copyright problem with File:Yaadian.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Yaadian.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log].

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Image Screening Bot (talk) 04:45, 15 June 2010 (UTC) Book is written by Jamil Ahmad Gondal (PSDP) Chairperson.

File:Yaadian.jpg listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Yaadian.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 18:04, 11 May 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Jamil Ahmad Gondal
Hello Jamilahmadgondal,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Jamil Ahmad Gondal for deletion, because it doesn't appear to contain any encyclopedic content. Take a look at our suggestions for essential content in short articles to learn what should be included.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. ow@!s (talk) 07:15, 2 December 2013 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:PAKISTAN SOCIALIST DEMOCRATIC PARTY.jpg
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:PAKISTAN SOCIALIST DEMOCRATIC PARTY.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:50, 5 December 2013 (UTC)