User talk:Jamirowikee

1RR
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in being blocked from editing&mdash;especially, as the page in question is currently under restrictions from the Arbitration Committee, if you violate the one-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than one revert on a single page with active Arbitration Committee restrictions within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the one-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the one-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Vaselineeeeeeee★★★ 19:40, 6 April 2021 (UTC)
 * , if you don't revert yourself, you will be blocked from editing. Dr. Swag Lord (talk) 21:09, 6 April 2021 (UTC)

On what grounds?
 * Did you not read the warning Vaselineeeeeeee gave you? You can not make more than 1 revert on the Ben Shapiro page. Dr. Swag Lord (talk) 21:18, 6 April 2021 (UTC)

The revert was simply in order to prevent the vandalism and the deletion of relevant information from the page in question, and as such was justified. The Wikipedia admin are free to do as they will.

Important Notice
Dr. Swag Lord (talk) 20:50, 6 April 2021 (UTC)

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. Thank you. Dr. Swag Lord (talk) 22:10, 6 April 2021 (UTC)

What's the point in dialogue when one can enter into bullying tactics? No need to employ one's wit in such situations. --Jamirowikee (talk) 22:43, 6 April 2021 (UTC)

April 2021
 You have been blocked from editing from certain namespaces ((Article)) for a period of 1 week for edit warring: Persistently restoring challenged content without discussion (WP:BURDEN, WP:ONUS). Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 19:40, 9 April 2021 (UTC)

When adding links to material on external sites, as you did to Christopher Hitchens, please ensure that the external site is not violating the creator's copyright. Linking to websites that display copyrighted works is acceptable as long as the website's operator has created or licensed the work. Knowingly directing others to a site that violates copyright may be considered contributory infringement. This is particularly relevant when linking to sites such as YouTube or Sci-Hub, where due care should be taken to avoid linking to material that violates its creator's copyright. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. If you believe the linked site is not violating copyright with respect to the material, then you should do one of the following:
 * If the linked site is the copyright holder, leave a message explaining the details on the article Talk page;
 * If a note on the linked site credibly claims permission to host the material, or a note on the copyright holder's site grants such permission, leave a note on the article Talk page with a link to where we can find that note;
 * If you are the copyright holder or the external site administrator, adjust the linked site to indicate permission as above and leave a note on the article Talk page;

If the material is available on a different site that satisfies one of the above conditions, link to that site instead. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 19:44, 9 April 2021 (UTC)

Important additional notices
Together with the American Politics notice above (20:50, 6 April 2021), that's four notifications about editing highly controversial topics, all before having made 100 edits on Wikipedia. I'd say that's too early, and – as you have noticed in the discussion at WP:ANEW and with other users – you may currently lack the experience to edit these topics without causing noticeable disruption. Please seriously consider avoiding these areas for now.

Ideas for uncontroversial contributions can be found at the Task Center and the community portal.

You are not required to do so, but further disruption will lead to a topic ban from such areas sooner or later. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 19:59, 9 April 2021 (UTC)

New message from ToBeFree
~ ToBeFree (talk) 20:12, 9 April 2021 (UTC)