User talk:Jamison Lofthouse/Archives/Jun 22 2012

CVUA Test Responses
Scenario 1: You encounter an IP vandalizing Hunter Pence by adding in statements that he is gay. Scenario 2: You see a new account called "Hi999" that is adding in random letters to pages and is making test edits. ✅
 * Would this be considered vandalism or disruptive editing?
 * First I would research the statement. Since that can be possible, I would see if it was true. If it was true depending on the statement I would choose to either leave it or use a Good-faith revert. If it was totally false then I would revert as vandalism. ✅
 * What would be an appropriate warning template to place on the IP's talk page?
 * Depending on the severity, I would mark as accordingly but I will always start with a low severity template. ✅ Actually, I was looking for a or a , but that's fine, also.
 * The user adds in curse words to the article 3 times. You keep on reverting the edits, but then you reach the 3rd time that you have to revert the edits. Can you be blocked for edit warring in this case?
 * Most likely not since I would be reverting vandalism. Edit warring occurs when there is a fight over content, not vandalism. Every time I would revert I would add a stricter message on the IPs talk. ✅ Yes, you can edit war when reverting vandalism.
 * Which of the following AIV entries should be made in this case: IP Vandal or Vandal
 * IP Vandal because it provides extra useful links. ✅ Because it's an IP!
 * Can this user be blocked indef.?
 * If the problem persists they will be blocked indef. but if the problem is minor it may not be. IP's cant be blocked indef.
 * Would this be considered vandalism or disruptive editing?
 * Since this user is new and doesn't know very much, it would be considered disruptive editing. ✅ Test edits are considered disruptive editing.
 * What would be an appropriate warning template to place on the IP's talk page?
 * I'm kind of confused over this one. Did you mean on the User's talk page. If you meant that it most likely would result in a welcome warning or a mild warning. ✅ The IP's talk page.
 * Which of the following Twinkle options should be used to revert these edits: Rollback-Vandal (Red), Rollback (Blue), or Rollback-AGF (Green)?
 * I haven't really found what AGF meant but I know it has to do with Good-Faith but what does the A mean? I would use Rollback (Blue) since it isn't vandalism but it isn't Good-Faith. So I picked the neutral one. ✅ AGF stands for Assume Good Faith.
 * The user stops making test edits after getting warned. Would it be appropriate to report this user to AIV?
 * Definitively not! If the problem is solved then their is no need to get the AIV involved. Anyways if the user got reported to the AIV, the AIV would just reject it since it was solved.
 * If this user keeps on vandalizing, can this user be blocked indef.?
 * Yes, If the problem persists and it is apparent that the user just vandalizes and does nothing good then they will be blocked. ✅

JamisonTalkGuestbookUserboxes  07:25, 21 June 2012 (UTC)

Your Score: 90%
 * Great Job! Next, I would like to work on STiki before you get rollback. Please read WP: STiki, and then I will teach you what buttons to click when. Thank you, Electriccatfish2 (talk) 17:04, 21 June 2012 (UTC).
 * ✅. Thanks! JamisonTalkGuestbookUserboxes  07:41, 22 June 2012 (UTC)