User talk:Jammy simpson/Archive2

For even older messages, please see here

Past Messages
You don't understand that it is merely my old username, linked to my real name, which I am trying to get rid of for reasons I do not want to further comment. This has absolutely nothing to do with vandalism. LIllIi 00:04, 3 January 2007 (UTC)

Did you change back anything I modified?! LIllIi 00:05, 3 January 2007 (UTC)

I have reverted the page, which removed the additional "FY." - if you were removing your own name, I see no reason why you needed to add to an archived talk page. However, if I have falsely accused you of vandalism, I apologise.  Jammy Simpson |  Talk  | 00:09, 3 January 2007 (UTC)

Yo im from Staten Island and dont be dissrespecting what my friend likes ok. Thank You. ~*Italians Rule*~ Yup Yup.VeyronX93

ummm why would i take out and add in my local newspaper about what my friend likes?!?

ok watever.

I'm not juvenille.

LOOK IM NOT JUVENILLE IM FROM AMERICA SO DONT TELL ME WAT TO DO AND IM FROM NEW YORK AND IM ITALIAN SO I HAVE ABAD TEMPER DONT BLOCK MY PAGE AGIAN!

A) Who are you? B) I do not have the power to block pages if I wanted to, anyway. C) Be civil and mark your name.  Jammy Simpson |  Talk  | 21:42, 5 January 2007 (UTC)

I was referring to nobody in particular, but if you would please add your signature in future, it would be appreciated.  Jammy Simpson |  Talk  | 04:22, 3 January 2007 (UTC)

Of course I will. =]

Plen
Hi, you just objected to my page about Plen. Let me make it clear that i fodun out about the robot on youtube and another site..and my only intention was to put ino about it on wikipedia so others can read it too i.e. upload it as fast as possible. Please consider my good intentions and reverse your stance. Thanks

Uch 22:23, 5 February 2007 (UTC) Umair Usman

Brick Walls
Quite often :) :: mikm t  03:01, 3 January 2007 (UTC)

tell me how to not get deletedFieldsoffire help me!!Fieldsoffire

Yes, I am aware of this but who is to say that just because this band has not won 3 grammys or recorded a full length platinum they do not deserve a place on Wikipedia? I mean, I can search for such no name acts as Brodie Hubbard on here and see that he has been approved, and cleary Fun Fun 101 and Hubbard are in the same boat. Iamconsumer 03:50, 3 January 2007 (UTC)iamconsumer

Mark Bellinghaus
I suggest taking to AfD, as it does assert notability, so is not CSD A7. See IMDb also. It was speedied about an hour ago and restored since. Tyrenius 04:34, 3 January 2007 (UTC)

Usertalk SiLaw7
Usertalk SiLaw7 i do not know how to otherwise post a 'reply' to you as there is no 'reply' button. email me if you have an issue with the content of my posts. -Simon 16:36, 3 January 2007 (UTC)SiLaw7

TEST REPLY TO JAMMY
FROM Usertalk SiLaw7 i do not know how to otherwise post a 'reply' to you as there is no 'reply' button. email me if you have an issue with the content of my posts. I added information that was missing and connected it to existing articles, which I did not edit.

-Simon 16:36, 3 January 2007 (UTC)SiLaw7

SiLaw7
I guess the copyright violation alert you left on SiLaw7's Talk Page was an alert for that User and not me. Acalamari 18:58, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Phew; all I did was restore your messages that SiLaw7 deleted from their own User Talk Page. Acalamari 19:02, 3 January 2007 (UTC)

Message Box
Hi there, I got the message box of somebody elses talk page because I too thought it looked good! So I don't mind if you take it but you do have to correct the links of where it goes to! Enjoy 2007

Tellyaddict Talk 22:06, 3 January 2007 (UTC)


 * Just saw what you did! Don't worry, I think everybody does it! I did with Unisouth's page -- Arriva436 17:43, 19 January 2007 (UTC)

Thank you
Thank you for the welcome note. --Lilidor 11:24, 4 January 2007 (UTC)

I don't understand why you voted my Wiki Entry out...
For HoodHype.com you selected it for deletion.

Why does AllHipHop.com get an entry? And what must we change to get in? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Hoodhype (talk • contribs) 17:23, 16 February 2007 (UTC).

Your VandalProof Application
Dear Jammy simpson,

Thank you for applying for VandalProof! (VP). As you may know, VP is a very powerful program, and in fact the just released 1.3 version has even more power. Because of this we must uphold strict protocols before approving a new applicant. Regretfully, I have chosen to decline your application at this time. The reason for this is that you don't yet have 250 mainspace edits. This is an absolute minimum unless you have a lot of edits in other namespaces. Also it seems that almost all of your edits have taken place in the last couple of days; we discourage extremely new users from using VP. Please note it is nothing personal by any means, and we certainly welcome you to apply again soon. Thank you for your interest in VandalProof.


 * Stamped for archiving  Jammy Simpson |  Talk  | 17:18, 17 February 2007 (UTC)

my apologies
my apoligies in my retort. i should have known better than to possibly violate copyright law, even though i did cite the location and provided a hyperlink. However, you vague posting made it appear that you were simply trashing the content itself, which made you appear hostile.

as for my own page, I was unaware that i could not delete hostile posts, such as yours appeared to be.


 * Stamped for archiving  Jammy Simpson |  Talk  | 17:19, 17 February 2007 (UTC)

Test
Test  Jammy Simpson |  Talk  | 18:57, 17 February 2007 (UTC)

Thank you! This is such a neat place. Wow! What a wonderful resource.

Edit for Senghor
Did I do that right? There was an important work missing, and I added it. --Happy2bme 15:23, 18 February 2007 (UTC)

USSI Article
Hi, thank you for posting to my talk page to open a discussion for this article regarding United Systems & Software Incorporated. I went out of my way to make this article factual and not sales driven in any way. It is a factual article about a company that in fact exists and is a known name within its industry. when compared to other insurance software companies who do appear in Wiki without issue mine went to lengths to follow guidelines and provide information about the company, not just "spam" as the article has so undeservedly been labeled. Examples:

     

I feel that I went out of my way to make the article fact based and actually provide information concerning a real company that is a well known name within it's industry. It may not be something glamorous like video games but its a legitimate software business none the less. Why does it make sense to have a page dedicated to a software developer of low budget video games but ignore another of high end insurance industry software as if the company did not exist at all. Is Wikipedia to be a collection of the world's knowledge through the eyes of one segment of the population who find insurance software too boring to note?

I understand and respect what Wikipedia is about, which is why I worked to create an article that is complete and informative, not an advertisement, but I think the reality of the world is missed quite often, that commerce and businesses play an enormous and pivotal role in how this world functions, and to blanket any mention of a company that is not producing something fun or hip as "blatant advertising" is short sighted in the greatest sense. United Systems and Software Incorporated exists, provides a valuable service to an important industry, and deserves acknowledgment of its existence in Wiki as much as Microsoft, Kryptiq Corporation, or Ambrosia Software. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by TheRealTerry (talk • contribs) 21:57, 19 February 2007 (UTC).

I see you deleted some of those business pages, you seem to have forgotten Ambrosia Software though. Hmmm, there are actually a lot of business pages throughout Wikipedia. What's the criteria? Do you have to produce video games or anime porn in order to be considered worthy of acknowledgment of existence by the editors? God forbid a company that actually does something productive get a page in Wiki.

RE: David robertson
Definitely not notable. Links only to a single other article, another wrestler in the 'KWA', a "short lived wrestling promotion" - it is not notable. Not to mention the incorrect name/conflict with an existing article named David Robertson.  Jammy Simpson |  Talk  | 11:32, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Hi, maybe not notable, but does assert notability. Therefore use nn for non-notable, unref, cleanup, orphan for the other problems, prod or Afd for deletion, and move to a disambiguated name (done) to solve the naming issue. Rich Farmbrough, 11:41 4  March 2007 (GMT).