User talk:Jamo9503

Fair use rationale for Image:Gail kim5 f.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Gail kim5 f.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 17:52, 21 October 2007 (UTC)

October 2007
This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing.  The Hybrid   T / C   19:02, 21 October 2007 (UTC)

You have been from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for persistent vandalism. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text below. Qwghlm 19:27, 21 October 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Gail kim5 f.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Gail kim5 f.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 15:18, 25 October 2007 (UTC)

Edit to Robbie Fowler
Please do not deliberately introduce incorrect information into articles. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Oldelpaso 08:37, 27 October 2007 (UTC)

Jam van dam
The article Jam van dam has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done because the article seemed to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it did not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources.

Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and for specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for musicians, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. NawlinWiki 00:51, 31 October 2007 (UTC)

Image tagging for
Thanks for uploading :. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. --OrphanBot (talk) 23:08, 17 November 2007 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Jamie David O'Shaunessy
A tag has been placed on Jamie David O'Shaunessy requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on |the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ukexpat (talk) 01:30, 13 January 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Jamie Lee Stone
A tag has been placed on Jamie Lee Stone requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on |the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ukexpat (talk) 01:42, 13 January 2008 (UTC)


 * In future please contest a deletion nomination as explained above, do NOT delete the "db" tag. --ukexpat (talk) 02:44, 13 January 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Jamie Lee Stone
An article that you have been involved in editing, Jamie Lee Stone, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/. Thank you. ŞůṜīΣĻ ¹98¹ Speak 14:47, 13 January 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of CWF Heavyweight Champonship
An editor has nominated CWF Heavyweight Champonship, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 14:59, 13 January 2008 (UTC)

You have recently recreated or reposted material which previously was deleted in accordance with Wikipedia's deletion policies. Please do not recreate this page without prior approval from an administrator or you may be blocked from editing. We ask that you respect what Wikipedia is not. If you disagree with the page's deletion, you may seek an independent deletion review. –– Lid(Talk) 16:30, 13 January 2008 (UTC)

January 2008
in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for. Please stop. You're welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text below.

A tag has been placed on, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a. If you can indicate how Jamie Lee Stone is different from the previously posted material, or if you can indicate why this article should not be deleted, I advise you to place the template hangon underneath the other template on the article, and also put a note on Talk:Jamie Lee Stone saying why this article should stay. An admin should check for such edits before deleting the article. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Please read our criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 4 under General criteria. If you believe the original discussion was unjustified, please feel free to use deletion review, but do not continue to repost the article if it is deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. We welcome your help in trying to improve Wikipedia, and we request you to follow these instructions.  Dachannien TalkContrib 18:09, 13 January 2008 (UTC)

Vandalism Jan 2008
This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. Because you apparently have a pretty extensive history of vandalism, you are getting only one warning. If you vandalize Wikipedia again like you did to Candice Michelle, I will block you. Nikki 311  21:11, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

February 2008
Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Z enlax T C S 20:44, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

Callum Sprit
I have listed this article at Articles for deletion because the subject does not appear to fit the notability requirements for inclusion in Wikipedia and I have not been able to find sufficient sources to expand the article. Please feel free to voice your thoughts in the deletion debate and to expand the article by adding information and references from reliable sources. Thank you, GaryColemanFan (talk) 07:25, 28 February 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Callum Sprit
An editor has nominated Callum Sprit, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 07:59, 28 February 2008 (UTC)

March 2008
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Polly (Parrot) 20:35, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Image:Wwe maria kanellis nude playboy pics 008.jpg
A tag has been placed on Image:Wwe maria kanellis nude playboy pics 008.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on  explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Polly (Parrot) 20:35, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Wwe maria kanellis nude playboy pics 008.jpg
Thank you for uploading Image:Wwe maria kanellis nude playboy pics 008.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 20:39, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Image:Wwe maria kanellis nude playboy pics 008.jpg
A tag has been placed on Image:Wwe maria kanellis nude playboy pics 008.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on  explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Polly (Parrot) 20:40, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself. Please use the template on the page instead if you disagree with the deletion. Polly (Parrot) 20:41, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

Celtic Wrestling
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Celtic Wrestling, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.bbc.co.uk/wales/southeast/sport/community/pages/wrestling.shtml. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 07:31, 25 April 2008 (UTC)

Copyright warning
Please do not add copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. —  Tivedshambo  (t/c) 07:36, 25 April 2008 (UTC)

April 2008
Thanks for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your recent edit appears to have added incorrect information, and has been reverted or removed. All information in the encyclopedia must be verifiable in a reliable published source. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 16:40, 27 April 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Jamie Stone wrestler
A tag has been placed on Jamie Stone wrestler requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. ~ a  kendall  22:43, 25 May 2008 (UTC)

Copyright violations, potential block notice
Regarding your contribution to Celtic Wrestling, you have been previously advised on this talk page that we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from web sites or printed material without the express permission of the author or copyright holder. This article was again a direct copy from this URL: http://www.bbc.co.uk/wales/southeast/sport/community/pages/wrestling.shtml As a copyright violation, the article has been deleted under the speedy deletion criteria.

There are circumstances where copying material may be appropriate, for example, if a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GNU Free Documentation License, or released into the public domain. If the material is not so released or otherwise in the public domain, you must have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL). To document that this is the case, when incorporating such material into articles:
 * If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at the talk page of the new article and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to <permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on the talk page of the article.

In this particular case, however, the article you are attempting to create appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Celtic Wrestling. A new article on this subject must address the concerns raised in that debate, in this case by providing references to multiple reliable sources to document widespread notability. Please read our criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 4 under General criteria. If you believe the original discussion was unjustified, please feel free to use deletion review, but do not continue to repost the article without addressing those concerns.

More urgently, please do not continue adding copyright material to Wikipedia's articles. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. If you add such material again, you may be blocked without further warning.

We welcome your help in trying to improve Wikipedia, and we request you to follow these instructions. If you have any questions about them, feel free to leave a note at my talk page or to ask at Wikipedia's help desk, typically manned around the clock by volunteers. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 12:35, 4 June 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Celtic Wrestling
A tag has been placed on Celtic Wrestling, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read our the guidelines on spam as well as the Business' FAQ for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you.  Neil N  <sup style="font-family:Calibri;"> talk  ♦  contribs  01:46, 8 June 2008 (UTC)

June 2008
This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. The next time you create an inappropriate page, you will be blocked from editing.  Neil N  <sup style="font-family:Calibri;"> talk  ♦  contribs  01:49, 8 June 2008 (UTC)

July 2008
You have been blocked from editing for violating Wikipedia policy, by repeatedly violating copyright laws after a final warning, most recently by placing the same copyrighted text on your userpage. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by replying here on your |talk page by adding the text. You may also email the blocking administrator or any administrator from this list instead, or mail unblock-en-l@mail.wikimedia.org.

This block will expire in one week. After it expires, please feel free to continue contributing within policies and guidelines, but do not place copyrighted material in violation of copyright laws on any page in Wikipedia. If you do so again, we may have no choice but to block you indefinitely for the legal protection of the project. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 14:05, 2 July 2008 (UTC)

October 2008
Please stop your disruptive editing. If your vandalism continues, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.  Black  ngold29   14:30, 8 October 2008 (UTC)

November 2008
Please stop your disruptive editing, such as the edit you made to John Beck (American football). If your vandalism continues, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.  steven  cho   14:30, 24 November 2008 (UTC) in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for. You are welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text below. Per a complaint at WP:AN3. EdJohnston (talk) 18:45, 25 November 2008 (UTC)

Jamie stone (American Football)
Hi! It seems you recently created an unreferenced biography of a living person: Jamie stone (American Football). Our verifiability policy requires that all content be cited to a reliable source. Please add references as soon as possible. Thanks! --LaraBot (talk) 00:10, 11 November 2009 (UTC)

Unreferenced BLPs
Hello Jamo9503! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created  is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current Category:All_unreferenced_BLPs article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the unreferencedBLP tag. Here is the article:

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 11:44, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) Jamie Stone (American football) -

Speedy deletion nomination of Switchblade (band uk)
A tag has been placed on Switchblade (band uk) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for musical topics. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you.  WackyWace  converse 08:51, 5 August 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Jamie Stone (American football)


The article Jamie Stone (American football) has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Does not meet WP:ATH. Not on current team roster. No reliable third party references establishing notability

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Plad2 (talk) 22:00, 23 August 2010 (UTC)

December 2011
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at JaMarcus Russell, you may be blocked from editing.  Nolelover   Talk · Contribs  14:25, 6 December 2011 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 Months for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Alexf(talk) 18:05, 6 December 2011 (UTC)