User talk:Jamone22

October 2015
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Temi Ejoor. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Super48paul (talk) 20:15, 25 October 2015 (UTC)

The page is slanderous and untrue
To Super48paul, the articles sited for the page about Temi Ejoor are based on slander and not fact. The editing done on this page was based on this and is not vandalism but simply removing false records to allow room for facts. It would be best to allow the edit until such time as credible documentation can be sited, if any is available. Thank you.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Temi Ejoor, you may be blocked from editing. Materialscientist (talk) 21:58, 25 October 2015 (UTC)

Slander is not fact it is slander
This information is slander not fact. I will remove information that is slander as it is defamatory and potentially damaging is cited as fact.

October 2015
Your recent editing history at Temi Ejoor shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Dl2000 (talk) 23:45, 25 October 2015 (UTC)