User talk:Jampeld

Your submission at Articles for creation: Cassius Chaney (October 28)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Clarityfiend was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Cassius Chaney and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Cassius Chaney, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "db-self" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Cassius_Chaney Articles for creation help desk] or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Clarityfiend&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Cassius_Chaney reviewer's talk page].
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Clarityfiend (talk) 07:25, 28 October 2018 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Cassius Chaney


Hello, Jampeld. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Cassius Chaney".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 06:47, 19 May 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of TigerTrends Magazine
Hello Jampeld,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged TigerTrends Magazine for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly indicate why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=&action=edit&section=new&preload=Template:Hangon_preload&preloadtitle=This+page+should+not+be+speedy+deleted+because...+ contest this deletion], but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

John B123 (talk) 17:45, 8 August 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Friedrich Schwandt


The article Friedrich Schwandt has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Not enough in-depth coverage from independent, reliable sources to pass WP:GNG."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.  Onel 5969  TT me 14:56, 26 August 2020 (UTC)

Minor edits
Hello Jampeld, I noticed that many of your edits adding new information to articles are marked as "minor". This is friendly reminder that standard is practice is to only mark edits as "minor" when they're typographical corrections, corrections of minor formatting errors, reversion of obvious vandalism, or similar (see Help:Minor edit for more details). Take care. &mdash;The Editor's Apprentice (talk) 23:16, 23 February 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 30
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Union Settlement, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Union Theological Seminary. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 30 July 2021 (UTC)