User talk:Jamzy4

You can leave a message on my talk page here, or alternatively, you can send me an email If you leave me a message on this page, I will reply on this page. If I left a message on your talk page, please reply there.

Proposed deletion of 247 Africa Magazine


The article 247 Africa Magazine has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * New magazine, clearly WP:TOOSOON. No independent references, only list of "celebrities featured" referenced to magazine itself (see WP:NOTINHERITED).

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on |the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Randykitty (talk) 17:15, 29 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Randykitty Thanks very much for your concern towards the page, you are right. I think the article will be improve before the giving date.--Jamzy4 (talk) 06:15, 30 July 2016 (UTC)

Recent edit to Fela Kuti
Hello, and thank you for your recent contribution. I appreciate the effort you made for our project, but unfortunately I had to undo your edit because I believe the article was better before you made that change. Feel free to contact me directly if you have any questions. Thank you! – FenixFeather  (talk) (Contribs)  00:08, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
 * FenixFeather Good thanks.--Jamzy4 (talk) 06:12, 30 July 2016 (UTC)

July 2016
Hello, I'm Jamie Tubers. An edit that you recently made to West Africa seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Jamie Tubers (talk) 02:24, 31 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Jamie Tubers Thanks.--Jamzy4 (talk) 07:19, 31 July 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Dami Adenuga


The article Dami Adenuga has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern:
 * No real evidence of notability. Being a PR manager isn't a qualifier for notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 14:22, 12 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Hello CambridgeBayWeather yes i understand you very well. "Being a PR manager isn't a qualifier for notability". The article will be improve as soon as possible. Can i ask a question on this issue?. Including Notable performance on the article does it meets Notability.
 * You need references to prove that he is notable. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 01:54, 13 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Thanks CambridgeBayWeather i will do that as possible before the date given.--Jamzy4 (talk) 20:11, 14 August 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Dami Adenuga for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dami Adenuga is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Dami Adenuga until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.  Versace1608  Wanna Talk? 21:41, 21 August 2016 (UTC)

Discussion concerning you at ANI
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Citobun (talk) 03:51, 8 October 2016 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for disruptive editing, including the nomination of numerous articles for AFD as revenge. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Someguy1221 (talk) 04:04, 8 October 2016 (UTC)

Apology for the reaction
Good day, I am very sorry for the reaction taken by me. I know within one week i will be unblock but i just need to apologies for the reaction taken, I know what i did was wrong by nominating your article for AFD, But you lead me into it, because of the frustration which you accuse on me as a COI editor, moving forward to your edit and then nominated all article written by me for AFD which was wrong according to WP:AFD. It is annoying for someone accusing you of something you know nothing about. I also apologize to for the reaction taking. I hope you all forgive me thanks.--Jamzy4 (talk) 11:46, 8 October 2016 (UTC)


 * There was nothing inappropriate about what Citobun did.


 * I am curious about your Commons submissions. How did you obtain these images? Rebb  ing  12:11, 8 October 2016 (UTC)


 * The images where obtained from the internet. While i created one myself which is called "I love Wikipedia" designed by me.--Jamzy4 (talk) 12:18, 8 October 2016 (UTC)


 * Ah. Thank you for your honesty. Unfortunately, uploading other people's images without permission is a serious copyright violation. It's also problematic from a truth standpoint: for each of those images, you claimed that the photograph was your own work. Rebb  ing  12:31, 8 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Yeah. That"s where i am having the problem. But don"t really know how to fix this issues, but when it comes to COI. I am definitely not engage with such.--Jamzy4 (talk) 12:41, 8 October 2016 (UTC)
 * But i don"t see any default nominating those article for AFD because their meets WP:GNG and WP:MUSICBIO.--Jamzy4 (talk) 13:18, 8 October 2016 (UTC)
 * That's a matter to be decided at the individual discussions. Looking at some of the articles myself, it's not at all clear they meet either GNG or MUSICBIO. Anyway, we don't say that a nomination is "wrong" merely because some people disagree with it. Citobun's nominations were well within the realm of reasonable possibilities. Rebb  ing  13:33, 8 October 2016 (UTC)