User talk:JaneEG

April 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, please do not add promotional material to articles or other Wikipedia pages, as you did to State capitalism. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" is against Wikipedia policy and not permitted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 19:47, 14 April 2010 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of The End of the Free Market
I have nominated The End of the Free Market, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/The End of the Free Market. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 19:51, 14 April 2010 (UTC)

State capitalism
I undid revision 359293211 by JaneEG, which replaced the opening para with a reference to a unnotable book. All her edits refer to that book of the author, so I suspect a conflict of interest. --Duncan (talk) 22:42, 30 April 2010 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Bremmer.Ian_UK_1_small.jpg
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Bremmer.Ian_UK_1_small.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --Duncan (talk) 22:50, 30 April 2010 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Bremmer_Ian_UK_2_large_cropped_1.jpg
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Bremmer_Ian_UK_2_large_cropped_1.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --Duncan (talk) 22:52, 30 April 2010 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Bremmer_-_Caplin_CU.JPG
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Bremmer_-_Caplin_CU.JPG, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.

Possibly unfree File:Bremmer_by_Voss.jpg
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Bremmer_by_Voss.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --Duncan (talk) 22:59, 30 April 2010 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:Bremmer.Ian UK 1 small.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Bremmer.Ian UK 1 small.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log].

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. — ξ xplicit  23:55, 30 April 2010 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:Bremmer Ian UK 2 large cropped 1.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Bremmer Ian UK 2 large cropped 1.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log].

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. — ξ xplicit  23:55, 30 April 2010 (UTC)

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Bremmer-close up.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Bremmer-close up.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, we also need to know the terms of the license that the copyright holder has published the file under, usually done by adding a licensing tag. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created [ in your upload log]. Unsourced and untagged files may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the file will be deleted 48 hours after 11:45, 1 May 2010 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:45, 1 May 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of The End of the Free Market
A tag has been placed on The End of the Free Market, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. TrulyBlue (talk) 18:51, 1 May 2010 (UTC)

May 2010
Please stop. If you continue to add promotional material to Wikipedia, as you did to The End of the Free Market, you may be blocked from editing. ''All your contributions seem to relate to Ian Bremmer and his book. There has already been a discussion in which wikipedians have decided that the book is not notable. Please read the articles on WP:NPOV, WP:COI and WP:SPAM before adding more material on this topic. Many thanks.'' TrulyBlue (talk) 18:56, 1 May 2010 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 21:14, 14 May 2010 (UTC)

Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion
There is currently a discussion at Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident with which you may be involved. Thank you. WhinyTheYounger (talk) 00:33, 14 June 2020 (UTC)