User talk:JaneFaber

First article
I responded to you on the Requests for Feedback page. Tkotc (talk) 06:31, 5 March 2011 (UTC)

Thanks, User:Tkotc. I heeded your advice from Requests for Feedback page and went to Wikipedia: Article Wizard and its userspace...JaneFaber (talk) 03:00, 6 March 2011 (UTC)


 * OK I got your note on my page but I can't find the article anywhere. I looked in your user space and there are no articles. When I start an article using the article wizard, the process takes me through several pages, where it asks about the subject, sources, notability, and content, and ends on a final page with three choices, (1) create article for review, (2) create new userspace draft, and (3) create new article. The option I pick, and which I suggest, is "2". After you do that, you have to type in all the stuff for the article. Is this the process you followed? Does all this seem familiar?


 * Anyhow, I have to think that somehow in this process you didn't save your work and it got dropped, because I can't find a thing. If you have your materials (or better yet, a draft), you could re-create it. No harm. Be very careful to name the article how you want it to appear, though. After you have finished, you can always find the page again by going to Special:Prefixindex, putting in your username, and looking on the namespace "User". This will list any articles in your userspace. Tkotc (talk) 04:46, 28 March 2011 (UTC)


 * Right. Thanks. I used the WP article wizard process but obviously not well enough. I'll resubmit-with-a-save. JaneFaber (talk) 08:12, 28 March 2011 (UTC)


 * I saw your post at one of the help pages. Don't worry at all about the draft page being called User talk:JaneFaber/Enter your new article name here. When the article has been reviewed, you will be able to choose a better title for it when you move it out of "user space" into "article space". See So you made a userspace draft and especially the example screenshot towards the bottom of that page. -- John of Reading (talk) 07:14, 1 April 2011 (UTC)


 * John of Reading, you've done kindly work. Thanks for advice on renaming the page. Am now reformatting its external links. JaneFaber (talk) 02:01, 2 April 2011 (UTC)

[Later] The article went live and, in time, other people weighed in with additional information. Much appreciated. JaneFaber (talk) 04:52, 11 February 2012 (UTC)

Another article
Process for another article got complicated (re Arctic Kangaroo). Article was then vetted by someone else. After article was created, followup was done by other editors and all went smoothly (circa October 2013). Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 18:08, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

[Tidywork] Trimmed the talk page, left the advice. JaneFaber (talk) 05:16, 1 December 2014 (UTC) and JaneFaber (talk) 18:55, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message
Thanks for alert re link to disambiguation page. Have removed the link. JaneFaber (talk) 04:29, 27 January 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:12, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Managing a conflict of interest
Hello, JaneFaber. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Barry M. Gough, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:


 * avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
 * propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the request edit template);
 * disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Conflict of interest);
 * avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Spam);
 * do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 15:08, 5 April 2023 (UTC)

April 2023
Please do not add or change content without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 15:09, 5 April 2023 (UTC)