User talk:Janet roe

August 2017
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Adam Morrison, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Favonian (talk) 21:37, 18 August 2017 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Penn Jillette, you may be blocked from editing. Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Penn Jillette was changed by Janet roe (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.889185 on 2017-08-19T01:57:16+00:00. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 01:57, 19 August 2017 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Richard Dawkins‎, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. — Paleo Neonate  – 03:02, 19 August 2017 (UTC)

Please stop making disruptive edits, as you did at Jodie Foster. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. "It is beginning to look like you are pushing a POV in your edits."  &mdash; jmcgnh  (talk) (contribs)  04:43, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Your recent editing history at Adam Morrison shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.'' Strictly speaking, it is a bit early for you to be getting this 3RR warning, but your entire edit history has been problematic. Experienced editors are attempting to explain to you that you can't just remove material without giving a valid reason. Removing it again without explanation constitutes edit warring and you may be blocked based on an overall pattern rather than just violating the 3RR rule.''  &mdash; jmcgnh  (talk) (contribs)  04:52, 19 August 2017 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Favonian (talk) 07:46, 19 August 2017 (UTC)