User talk:Janethomas13/sandbox

Everything in this article as relevant to the topic and there was nothing that distracted me. There is no information that was out of date and more information could be added to increase the article's credibility. The only thing that I would improve would be adding to it to give the readers more information. The article is neutral and there are no claims that are heavily biased to a particular position. The fact that fidgeting is a negative trait is highly represented and there is not much information about any positive effects of it. the links work and the source supports the claims made in the article. The information that is found in these sources is reliable and not biased. The article was related as mildly important and was rated as a B on the quality scale. When we evaluate articles in class, we use outside websites to do this. On Wikipedia, they have the reviews right there on the page.

Possible Articles
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Forehand

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emotional_well-being

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sleep_deprivation

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vitamin_C

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ironing

These are article choices that could be used for the editing wikipedia exercise that we will do. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Janethomas13 (talk • contribs) 06:02, 26 February 2019 (UTC)