User talk:Janetlovell

Welcome!
Hello, Janetlovell, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your recent contributions seem to be advertising or for promotional purposes. Wikipedia does not allow advertising. For more information on this, please see: If you still have questions, there is a new contributors' help page, or you can. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia: I hope you enjoy editing Wikipedia! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! Writ Keeper &#9863;&#9812; 22:58, 4 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Policy on neutral point of view
 * Guideline on spam
 * Guideline on external links
 * Guideline on conflict of interest
 * FAQ for Organizations
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and how to develop articles
 * Help pages
 * Tutorials
 * Article wizard for creating new articles
 * Simplified Manual of Style

Thank you for letting me know. I was trying to keep it simple and follow the guidelines but I am not sure how to fix it. Here is what we are about - We are not promoting anything this is what we are saying - We believe everyone has admirable inner qualities that can passionately voice their humanity. But that story is often untold. It’s one that uniquely expresses who we really are as individuals. We also believe our strength lies in embracing that story without filtering it through someone else’s definition of beauty. When our core values are reflected on the outside, we have truly given the world the gift we were born to give. We aspire to introduce beauty and wholeness to a world that may not yet understand its own self-worth. So with a deep desire to bring the beauty within to the forefront of defining ourselves–especially for vulnerable young women and children–we came up with a social change campaign focusing on human trafficking. It’s called the #InnerBeauty Challenge.

Thanks J. Lovell Janetlovell (talk) 23:12, 4 October 2020 (UTC)
 * sounds very interesting YET motivating i love it BumbleBeast57445 23:13, 4 October 2020 (UTC)


 * Thank you BumbleBeast7445
 * J. Lovell Janetlovell (talk) 23:16, 4 October 2020 (UTC)


 * its BumbleBeast57445 and i am glad that you are satisfied BumbleBeast57445 23:27, 4 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Okay, so there are a few problems to unpack here. First, you use the plural pronoun "we" a lot; you should know up front that Wikipedia does not allow user accounts to be used by or passed between multiple people; the rule is "one person, one account".
 * Second, everything you said is great and all, but that does not make it suitable for a Wikipedia article. The colloquial phrase here is that Wikipedia is not out to right great wrongs; just because your cause is noble (and I'm certainly not saying it isn't!) doesn't mean that a Wikipedia article can be created for your subject. Wikipedia is, first and foremost, about verifiability--that is, all information that is included in Wikipedia must be able to be verified by a reader through a citation to a reliable, independent source. This is a result of Wikipedia's "anyone can edit" policy; if anyone can edit, then citations to reliable sources are the only way a reader can begin to trust the information in articles. If information is not verifiable because it hasn't been written about in reliable sources, then it doesn't belong on Wikipedia.
 * Because of this emphasis on verifiability, there are some subjects that cannot have a Wikipedia article at all, because there are no reliable sources that discuss those subjects. Wikipedia does not aim to have an article on every possible subject under the sun; instead, our acceptance criterion is referred to as notability. "Notability" is a bit of a term of art on Wikipedia, and can have some different meanings for different types of subject, but at its most basic, notability means: "If a topic has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject, it is presumed to be suitable for a stand-alone article." If a topic does not have such coverage, then there probably isn't enough sourcing to be able to write verifiably at all about that topic, and so an article cannot be made for it on Wikipedia.
 * So, to get back into specifics, in order for your desired article to be made on Wikipedia, you would need to show that it has already been discussed in depth by multiple, independent, reliable sources. To put it another way, a Wikipedia article is not the way to "get the word out" about something you've newly created; a Wikipedia article is what happens as a result of the word getting out already. So, the way to address the concerns would be to include citations to reliable sources that are independent of the creators or proponents of this social change campaign, that discuss it in depth. Honestly, I doubt such sources exist, but if you have them, they are the way to go.
 * Also, I included these links in the welcome message above, but I want to take a second to highlight them again: our policies about neutral point of view, spam, and conflicts of interest. It sounds like you are affiliated with the people who created this campaign. You should know that Wikipedia strongly discourages editing directly about subjects to which you are affiliated personally or (especially) professionally, due to the inherent conflict of interest that that creates. Wikipedia strives for a neutral point-of-view, and editing with a conflict of interest makes preserving that neutral point-of-view incredibly difficult. If you're here because you work on this campaign and are trying to promote it, I definitely recommend that, well, you don't do that. That's not what Wikipedia is for.
 * Finally, let me just say that none of this is personal, either to you or to the cause you're working on. It certainly seems noble, and I hope y'all accomplish good things with it. Wikipedia just isn't the place for it. If you would like to edit about other subjects, you're definitely more than welcome to do so. Regardless, thanks for the effort, and good luck in the future. Writ Keeper &#9863;&#9812; 23:41, 4 October 2020 (UTC)


 * National inner beauty day is not a campaign - they partner with other organizations to highlight inner beauty. Which is all over the internet - inner Beauty. I am not working for NIB nor was I a part of any of their campaigns. October 7th is National inner beauty day - the page is about National Inner Beauty Day. It’s not highlighting any campaigns or affiliation with any -


 * Thanks again I will take a look at the links you sent. Janetlovell (talk) 00:03, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
 * please use indents any time you write replies on you or another editor's talk page. You can do so by going into source mode and putting in a colon before your reply. BumbleBeast57445 17:27, 6 October 2020 (UTC)