User talk:Jani Koskiin

May 2020
Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion, which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Do not remove g4 tags as they need to be reviewed by an administrator. Praxidicae (talk) 15:37, 22 May 2020 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at New Saxon Spelling shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Praxidicae (talk) 15:39, 22 May 2020 (UTC)

I have NOT created myself the page you are talking about. And all efforts to delete this page is vandalism and linguistic discrimination in its purest form. (Jani Koskiin (talk) 15:43, 22 May 2020 (UTC))
 * Keep accusing people of vandalism without evidence and you'll quickly find yourself blocked indefinitely for personal attacks. Praxidicae (talk) 15:45, 22 May 2020 (UTC)
 * The evidence and the arguments are (or were) on the discusion page of the article. (Jani Koskiin (talk) 15:50, 22 May 2020 (UTC))

Deletion
Please do not recreate pages when they have just been deleted, especially by copying and pasting the content (this additionally creates a copyright violation). Nick (talk) 15:48, 22 May 2020 (UTC)
 * There weren't any reason to delete the page, unless ideological reasions which base on nothing else but linguistic discrimination. (Jani Koskiin (talk) 15:51, 22 May 2020 (UTC))
 * What "ideological reasions" do you think I have when it comes to "New Saxon Spelling" ? Nick (talk) 15:55, 22 May 2020 (UTC)

I see that you refused to follow my instruction regarding the recreation of content. I have, accordingly, blocked you indefinitely. You may find this page useful as it provides instructions on appealing your block. Nick (talk) 16:07, 22 May 2020 (UTC)