User talk:Janjimini

Welcome!
Hello Janjimini! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you you need any help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place   on your talk page and ask your question there. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Happy editing! JamesBWatson (talk) 16:46, 7 February 2011 (UTC)

Welcome
Welcome to Wikipedia. Experienced users are supposed to welcome new editors. There is a nice welcome tag but I'm too lazy to put it on. I got no doubt someone else will. The user page is not the same as the discussion page. Both are tabbed at the top. Messages go on this page, the discussion page. The user page will stop showing red when you put something on it. I would say you should, even if only one word (I've seen "Hello") so as to avoid the impression of a total newcomer or a fugitive or predator avoiding justice by concealing his experienced WP identity. For the issue that brought you on, you're on your own. This is a typical WP entry, very contentious. WP is a most contentious place, in my opinion.Dave (talk) 01:41, 6 February 2011 (UTC)

Hello again
Hello there. Sorry that thing with the mountains did not work out. I hope you don't get discouraged. I'm sure there are a lot of contributions you can make. The problem with not contributing is this, and I have encountered this problem in a large number of circumstances. WP is growing and the public is willing to pay for it. Increasingly we cannot get away from it. If we get indignant and proud and refuse to contribute anything then we are in a default situation. We are by choice leaving the encyclopedia to others probably a lot less sensitive and a lot less qualified. So then, we are going to see only trash articles. I've been disgusted a number of times. Overall however I have made about 27000 changes and only 57 were reverted. My first article on here was attacked and deleted. I was called a religious freak and they explained how they did not want any religious freaks around here. You always have to ask who, however. By now you may have read the latest from Wikimedia Foundation. You see there really is a problem with the experienced driving off the novices. I'm not sure what they are going to do about it but I am heartened by the cognizance. I just read a user page by a young man who is going to tell us how to write the English language and DARES anyone to stop him. It is pretty easy to get arrogant on here. The figures show that there are plenty of cliques and commercial interests here. They have a number of tricks to make life pretty uncomfortable. They get their buddies to chime in also. On the whole though I have some good editing on here even though I get pretty disgusted sometimes. So I would say if you want to help give the people accurate information, don't give in to the cliques, just let it all run off your back like water and you may often be pleasantly surprised. You sound to me as though you may have some valuable insights on Italian culture. Thanks for your interest and thanks for contacting me. I was probably your best chance of getting the article changed but we were overridden. Even if you could have changed it probably someone would have changed it back. Que sera sera. Well I got to go now but you should not think what happened to you never happens to anyone else. This is very large cross-section of literate humanity and I am absolutely certain you must know how hard it is to get agreement.Dave (talk) 15:23, 11 March 2011 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation
 Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.
 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia&.
 * To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the [ reviewer's talk page] . Please remember to link to the submission!
 * You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.
 * Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Arctic   Kangaroo  13:43, 1 May 2013 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation
 Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.
 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia&.
 * To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the [ reviewer's talk page] . Please remember to link to the submission!
 * You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.
 * Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Gmt2001 (talk) 13:05, 6 May 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Carl Larsson Degerfeldt concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Carl Larsson Degerfeldt, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 02:31, 7 November 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Carl Larsson Degerfeldt concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Carl Larsson Degerfeldt, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:31, 25 July 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Carl Larsson Degerfeldt concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Carl Larsson Degerfeldt, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:30, 26 January 2015 (UTC)

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Carl Larsson Degerfeldt


Hello Janjimini. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Carl Larsson Degerfeldt".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply and remove the  or  code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by one of two methods (don't do both): 1) follow the instructions at WP:REFUND/G13, or 2) copy this code:, paste it in the edit box at this link , and click "Save page". An administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 17:22, 28 January 2015 (UTC)