User talk:Janklasovity

Welcome!
Hello, Janklasovity, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page Britain (place name) has not conformed to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and has been or will be removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or in other media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles. Additionally, all new biographies of living people must contain at least one reliable source.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or. Again, welcome. Doug Weller talk 13:03, 2 April 2016 (UTC)

To clarify
In a nutshell, sources need to meet WP:RS and discuss the subject of the article. As I had to learn when I started editing, this is not at all like writing an essay or a paper for a journal, our own ideas and interpretations are not wanted. See WP:NOR. Doug Weller talk 13:09, 2 April 2016 (UTC)

Britain
(To reiterate what said:)  If your theories are published by independent reliable sources, they can be included here. Otherwise, they will not be - we do not permit the use of original research. Ghmyrtle (talk) 12:50, 9 April 2016 (UTC)

This time it is not original research Doug, can you disapprove that these places exist? You can't of course, these places do exist. This is to point out at blindness / pride / idiotism of western linguists in the last 300 hundred years who apparently did not notice that mass of toponyms with bratt/britt root all over Europe. See Ghmyrtle talk. Good night. --Janklasovity (talk) 20:31, 9 April 2016 (UTC)