User talk:Janm67

Edgar F. Codd
thanks for your contributions to the EFCodd article. I don't mean to berate, but to praise, beacuse I think the change was a good one. I marked it as because I think that you would be the best person to find ths source for such a comment. I think the EFCodd article can be a featured article soon, and we need more sources cited for that. Thanks for your help, and welcome to wikipedia! McKay 03:46, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
 * w00t!! Thanks. McKay 18:44, 4 December 2006 (UTC)

Carl Hewitt
Hi! During the recent AfD discussion about the article Carl Hewitt you expressed some concerns about the article, and suggested that it needed to be rewritten. I have undertaken a substantial rewrite of the article in an attempt to address the concerns raised by you and other editors, and would appreciate it if you could look over the current state of the article to see if you have any suggestions for further improvement. Thanks. --Allan McInnes (talk) 14:06, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Looks good to me, thanks! Janm67 15:27, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Thanks! --Allan McInnes (talk) 06:09, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

Avrim Blum
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Avrim Blum, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add db-author to the top of Avrim Blum. FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 12:57, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Jeanne Ferrante
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Jeanne Ferrante, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Nick Garvey (talk) 06:40, 28 September 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Anant Agarwal
I have nominated Anant Agarwal, an article you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Anant Agarwal. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. RMHED (talk) 21:56, 30 October 2008 (UTC)

Potential DYK
Great article stub at Giles Brindley - I think if you could expand it a little the erectile dysfunction demonstration would make a great hook for a WP:DYK! Gonzonoir (talk) 11:49, 14 January 2009 (UTC)

Thank you for your suggestion
I am contacting Ban Ki Moon too. He hasn't been on the job as long as the others, but this matter requires all hands on deck. ChildofMidnight (talk) 22:42, 21 February 2009 (UTC)

Battle for Saarbrücken
You added information from the after the Battle magazine about the Battle of Saarbrücken, also about Wolf-Günther_Trierenberg. Thank you very much for this much needed information.

However, I'm not sure it is complete. In January 1945, this map shows the 347th in Saarbrücken. According to, The 347. Infantrie-Division was part of the 1st Army, LXXXV Coprs in February 1945, stationed in the Saarpfalz area. A map of operation undertone shows that Saarbrücken was indeed defended by the LXXXV Corps in March 1945. However, the [http://www.lexikon-der-wehrmacht.de/Gliederungen/Volksgrenadierdivisionen/559VGD-R.htm 559. Volks-Grenadier-Division] was also in the area of Saarbrücken as part of the XIII SS Corps in February 1945. It seems very likely that they took part in the engagements. From a discussion in a german forum, I get it that the 347th was stationed a bit to the west of Saarbrücken, in the area of Bous (Buß, Buss) - Grande-Rossele (Großrosseln) in March 1945, fell back to the area of Völklingen - Püttlingen March 18th and fully left the area in the night from March the 19th to March the 20th. Those areas are slightly to the west of Saarbrücken, and the Grande-Rossele is actually on the western flank of the battle for Saarbrücken, where a lot of the fighting took place.

Can you check your source again for information about the center Spichern-Stellung or the eastern flank (Spicheren, Giffertswald)? The source is sadly not available online.--Micge (talk) 13:05, 9 March 2016 (UTC)