User talk:Jansenradcliffe

Little context in Red rhapsody
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Red rhapsody, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Red rhapsody is very short providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Red rhapsody, please affix the template to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Android Mouse Bot 2 04:24, 15 August 2007 (UTC)


 * I looked for references to the term on AVN, Fleshbot, RAME, and other well known pornography news sites. Nothing. Deleting, per combination of "no context"(WP:CSD), and, possibly more apt, "dictionary definition" (WP:CSD). If you can give a Verifiable reference, feel free to recreate. --AnonEMouse (squeak) 04:36, 15 August 2007 (UTC)