User talk:JanuaryK

Welcome!
Hello, JanuaryK, and welcome to Wikipedia!&#32;Thank you for your contributions.

I noticed that one of the first articles you edited was National Heritage Foundation, which appears to be dealing with a topic with which you may have a conflict of interest. In other words, you may find it difficult to write about that topic in a neutral and objective way, because you are, work for, or represent, the subject of that article.&#32;Your recent contributions may have already been undone for this very reason.

To reduce the chances of your contributions being undone, you might like to draft your revised article before submission, and then ask me or another editor to proofread it. See our help page on userspace drafts for more details. If the page you created has already been deleted from Wikipedia, but you want to save the content from it to use for that draft, don't hesitate to ask anyone from this list and they will copy it to your user page.

One rule we do have in connection with conflicts of interest is that accounts used by more than one person will unfortunately be blocked from editing. Wikipedia generally does not allow editors to have usernames which imply that the account belongs to a company or corporation. If you have a username like this, you should request a change of username or create a new account. (A name that identifies the user as an individual within a given organization may be OK.)

Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
 * The plain and simple conflict of interest guide
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! Drmies (talk) 17:11, 30 July 2015 (UTC)

Help please
I work at National Heritage Foundation. I was trying to update the wiki article with some facts, but it seems that there are individuals that are making harassing statements about NHF on this page. Here is a draft of what I believe the page should be:

The National Heritage Foundation (NHF) was formed by Dr. J.T. "Dock" Houk in 1994."National Heritage Foundation". In 1998, it became one of the largest charities in the country.

On August 16, 2006, in response to the Pension Protection Act of 2006, NHF changed the way they made grants from their umbrella projects to charitable programs. NHF informed all its projects that only 26 U.S.C. § 501(c)(3) organizations would be able to continue to receive grants from NHF.[1]

In January 2009, the NHF filed for chapter 11 bankruptcy protection. During this bankruptcy process, donor advised foundations were not able to disburse funds to other non-profits.[2]

In late 2009, NHF emerged from bankruptcy and fulfilled its reorganization plan.[citation needed]

Effective May 11, 2011, NHF became a 26 U.S.C. § 501(c)(3), 509(a)(3) charitable support organization.[3] References

−

Department of Labor. "Pension Protection Act of 2006 (PL 109-280)" (PDF). United States Government. Patton Boggs LLP. "The National Heritage Foundation's Plan of Reorganization". Patton Boggs LLP.

"IRS Exempt Organizations Publication 78". Internal Revenue Service.

External links

National Heritage Foundation Official Website

Please help me to make this page correct, and have information posted without bias. Someone is making changes to this site, and making subjective (and malicious) comments on this article that this company was involved in fraudulent activities. Can you please assist me in creating a truthful article here about NHF? Thank you for your assistance.


 * I have compared your and CorporateM's version, and I find that CorporateM's is a far better summary of what reliable sources report than yours, which adds trivia but removes well-sourced, though unfavorable, content. You can't really call it "malicious" to summarize what sources like The New York Times had to say about the NHF. In fact, there's even a guideline that asks us to assume good faith. Please also see the guideline on conflicts of interest and the Terms of Use regarding paid editing. Huon (talk) 01:45, 5 August 2015 (UTC)